Talk:Battle of Jajau

Battle of Jajau has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 30, 2016. (Reviewed version).

India: Madhya Pradesh / History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Madhya Pradesh (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Asian / South Asia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Jonesey95, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 29 November 2015.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Previous copyedits:
/
	This article was copy edited by Corinne on 10 November 2015.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of Jajau/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk · contribs) 17:47, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I will be reviewing this article. Comments will come soon.Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 17:47, 5 March 2016 (UTC) Here are the issues:[reply]

Fix the clarification tag.

Fixed. RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 09:13, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Could you add more sources?

Why? The two sources primarily used are the most reliable references for later Mughal period, used in almost all universities in India. RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 09:13, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No need to put a citation before the exact same citation. It looks like this:aaaaaa[10]aaaaaaa[10]

Fixed.RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 09:13, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per MOS:NUM, numbers less than nine are written as words.

Do you want to mean the dates? 1 June etc? Otherwise all follow the number system. RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 09:13, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 18:08, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Passing. Good Job!Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 21:43, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tomandjerry211 (alt)

Untitled

I have a question about this article. According to the article, the battle took place on June 20, 1707, and after Azam Shah and his three sons were killed in the battle, Bahadur Shah was crowned emperor on June 19, 1707. How could he have been crowned emperor after his brother and nephews were killed in battle, yet a day before that battle took place? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:940:4200:3EE4:82E:39C0:1AA7:544F (talk) 06:47, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

War was helped by Guru Govind

I doubt it. Sanguine1234 (talk) 17:09, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]