This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Afghanistan, a project to maintain and expand Afghanistan-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AfghanistanWikipedia:WikiProject AfghanistanTemplate:WikiProject AfghanistanAfghanistan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mongols, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mongol culture, history, language, and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MongolsWikipedia:WikiProject MongolsTemplate:WikiProject MongolsMongols articles
It is absurd that the battle is wanted to be deleted because it is small, this war takes place not only in Manz but also in other sources.I will add the publishers, isbn numbers and publication dates of the sources. The sources I give are reliable. Battle is real and petty-insignificant, etc. The request to be deleted for reasons such as this is for propaganda purposes.Something that has happened cannot be deleted for such reasons. Kurya Khan (talk) 15:04, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Then what reasons might it be deleted for, may I inquire? Or perhaps you believe that all things that have happened should remain on Wikipedia forever? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ([[User
talk:AirshipJungleman29|talk]]) 16:56, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
This page should be deleted. Kurya Khan's articles are written in poor grammar, are clearly biased and go against Wikipedia's policy of Neutral Point of View. Sayyid Debastani (talk) 07:31, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
More of the same poorly sourced battle articles. One source(Irons) made no mention of Timur/Tamerlane, battle of Belh, Balkh, or anything to do with this supposed battle. Too much reliance on unverifiable "sources"(primary, non-English, et.al.). --Kansas Bear (talk) 22:14, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]