Talk:Battelle Memorial Institute

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio (assessed as Low-importance).

‹See TfM›

Physics: History Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by History Taskforce.

Battelle operation of US Military's Dugway Proving Ground in Utah

Battelle is also now doing top secret work at the US Military's Dugway Proving Ground in Utah, a facility which I believe Battelle now operates. I have already dug up one source, and I will get a couple more and add something to the article.WacoJacko (talk) 14:17, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite needed

Much of the material in the article reads too much like a PR document. I suspect it has come directly off their web page. It should be re-written to be less biased in tone and to read more like an encylopedia article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.168.50.76 (talk) 11:00, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article also needs a discussion of the lawsuit against Battelle for failing to honor the terms of the endowment, which was to support orphans. That legal battle took decades -- and note there is not a word in the article about what Battelle does with its profits. It was supposed to support the orphans of Franklin County, Ohio. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.9.209.34 (talk) 15:51, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No re-write is needed. Regarding the above remarks:

An article that "reads too much like a PR document" can result from "creative" writing or (as appears to be the case here) from good writing.
Battelle was not established to benefit orphans but to prompt education and research in science, according to the article about it's founder, Gordon Battelle.
ROI that came from developing the xerographic process was impossible to plan for -- the reward exceeded any reasonable expection. When a particular candidate for office sought election, he also sought a platform. Part of that platform served as encouragement to Battelle to fund the Columbus Convention Center in 1974. The following is quoted from this URL: http://www.columbusconventions.com/.

"In 1974, Battelle Memorial Institute contributed $36.5 million and established the Battelle Commons Company to develop a convention facility in downtown Columbus. Construction began in February 1978, with doors to the Ohio Center, and its premier venue, Battelle Hall, opening on September 10, 1980."

Kernel.package (talk) 18:48, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Manhattan Project

I've seen a newspaper article from a Columbus paper honoring those who contributed to the Manhattan Project. Either an employee was named or Battelle (as their employer) was among them. I'm trying to locate a copy of the article. Reference to the project should probably be included in the article. Kernel.package (talk) 18:56, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Xerox & Haloid

In the Technological and medical advances section it states "Work led to the first commercial xerographic equipment, and to the formation of Xerox corporation."

As keen bee seen in the wiki on Xerox, The Haloid Photographic Company was the company founded in 1906 that evolved into Xerox. I believe that Battelle made a deal with Carlson for the basic, but not practical xerox technology, advanced it to practicality and then sold the rights to Haloid which ultimately was renamed as Xerox.

thus both the Battelle wiki and the Xerox wiki should reflect the same basic facts.

The following discussion from the Chester Carlson wiki is probably a better account of the Battelle/Haloid collaboration:

"By the fall of 1945, Battelle agreed to act as Carlson's agent for his patents, pay for further research, and develop the idea. Battelle tried to interest major printing and photography companies, like Eastman Kodak and Harris-Seybold, to license the idea, but to no avail.

The commercial breakthrough came when John Dessauer, chief of research at the Haloid Company, read an article about Carlson's invention. Haloid, a manufacturer of photographic paper, was looking for a way out of the shadow of its Rochester, New York, neighbor, Eastman Kodak. Through previous acquisitions, Haloid was already in the duplicating-machine business; Dessauer thought that electrophotography might allow Haloid to expand into a new field that Kodak did not dominate.

In December 1946, Battelle, Carlson, and Haloid signed the first agreement to license electrophotography for a commercial product. The $10,000 contract—representing ten percent of Haloid's total earnings from 1945—granted a nonexclusive right to make electophotography-based copying machines intended to make no more than twenty copies of an original. Both sides were tentative; Battelle was concerned by Haloid's relatively small size, and Haloid had concerns about electrophotography's viability.

During this period, Battelle conducted most of the basic research into electrophotography, while Haloid concentrated on trying to make a commercial product out of the results."

Michael Marcus — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjmarcus (talk • contribs) 20:08, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Battelle Memorial Institute/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

As memory serves, there was a lengthy court battle over whether Battelle was following the guidelines in Gordon Battelle's will. The fight culminated in a decision circa 1970 in which Battelle agreed to act as a charity; supposedly it had not done so previously. It would take some digging in the archives (morgue) of the Columbus newspapers or in the Franklin County Courthouse to dig up the details.75.0.232.90 (talk) 21:14, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 21:14, 12 May 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 09:06, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Battelle Memorial Institute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:13, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Howard C. Cross" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Howard C. Cross. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 4#Howard C. Cross until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 00:34, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]