Talk:Baruch ben Neriah

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Bible Mid‑importance

	Bible portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity Mid‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Judaism Mid‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Saints Low‑importance

	Saints portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saints, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Saints and other individuals commemorated in Christian liturgical calendars on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SaintsWikipedia:WikiProject SaintsTemplate:WikiProject SaintsSaints articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ancient Near East Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Baruch ben Neriah appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 May 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the seal of Baruch ben Neriah, a legendary 6th century BCE scribe and disciple of the Biblical prophet Jeremiah, was found imprinted on two clay bullae excavated in 1975 and 1996?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2006/May.

Wikipedia

Historicity

Rollston et. al do not discuss the 1975 bulla at all, and Goren says it has not been lab tested, though he did imply that it could be questioned on the same paleographic grounds as the 1996 bulla. Perhaps, "Some commentators have questioned the authenticity of both bullae" is not precisely warranted by the cited references. —Hanina

This paper https://www.academia.edu/10134823/The_Authenticity_of_the_Bullae_of_Berekhyahu_Son_of_Neriyahu_the_Scribe appears to conclude that the bullae are forgeries: — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.54.247.158 (talk) 07:26, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Grave: This section seems to be made of nothing more than myth; is it the place of a reputable reference source to cite myth? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.239.121.86 (talk) 05:34, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't dug up anything definitive, but the bulla generally seem to be accepted as fakes by now. Here is one source actually saying why: https://www.sbl-site.org/publications/article.aspx?ArticleId=292 . Somebody should probably update this. I don't even know the etiquette for talk pages, let alone articles. It just happened to be in my field of interest, so I thought I'd say something. 2607:FB90:33F:30F8:C93F:918E:7C64:F7D3 (talk) 20:27, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]