Talk:Barrett XM500

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

6800 meters

what is this information no bullet in the .50 caliber range can go out that far it is impossible that might be the maximum theoretical ballistic range. please provide accurate information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.171.168.66 (talk) 13:09, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Effective Range and Range

Citation need. User talk:Madcaptain-896 —Preceding undated comment added 14:52, 30 October 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Accuracy citation request?

Who tagged "citation needed" for the assertion that the fixed-barrel XM500 will likely be more accurate than the recoiling barrel M82? It's an established fact that (all else being equal) if you have a barrel moving separate from the receiver where the optics are mounted, you will NEVER have the accuracy of a weapon where the barrel is fixed in relation to the optics. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.216.155.179 (talk) 23:48, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]