Talk:Baron Hill, Anglesey

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture: Historic houses Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to merge Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:46, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I propose that Baron Hill Park be merged into Baron Hill (house) and the combined paged be moved to Baron Hill, Anglesey. I think that the content of both source articles can easily be explained in the context of Baron Hill, Angelsey, and both source articles are of a reasonable size that the merging of them will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 05:46, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have any problems with a sympathetic merge. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 06:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I won't oppose as long as we get the spelling of "Anglesey" right. We can always split them again if either becomes more noteworthy for whatever reason. Deb (talk) 09:45, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reasonable proposal 24February 2017 Clive sweeting

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.