Talk:Barhaspatya sutras

Philosophy: Literature / Eastern / Ancient Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Eastern philosophy
	Ancient philosophy

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Could anyone please write the lines of navagraha pooja ?

Charvaka Sixty

Dakshinaranjan Shastri's compilations include many aphorisms from the Mimamsa-sutra, Nyaya-sutra and Samkhya-sutra mistakenly believed to be Carvaka fragments (as explained, among others, by Ramakrishna Bhattacharya in "Carvaka Fragments: A New Colection").

The current page reads, I quote: "Dakshinaranjan Shastri in 1928 published 60 such verses. In 1959, he published 54 selected verses as Barhaspatya sutram. Shastri was of the opinion that many more fragments could be recovered. Ramkrishna Bhattacharya (2002) attempts a new reconstruction, with the caveat that the more verses are listed, the greater the uncertainty that it will be either misquoted or foreign materials included as a part of the text."

The current page seems to suggest that Shastri's compilation is the most conservative one and that Bhattacharya simply lists more verses that may or may not belong to the Carvaka, and that is simply not the case. 21st century compilations include aphorisms from works that were not known by scholars in the mid-20th century, and get rid of aphorisms that have been proven to belong to different traditions.