Talk:Barbican

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Barbican article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Fortifications / Technology / British / European / Medieval

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

Architecture Start‑class High‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Celtic?

Im sure I read in a place name book that 'the barbican' in looe is a mutation from a celtic name, I think it ended byghan/bean/beghan (small.) I don't know if this is a 'possibility' rather than something taken from old maps or references but if it is definite then it would raise the possibilty of some other areas being named in the same way. Unfortunatley I don't have the book so I can't check it up. obviously the name probably would have been changed to the common 'barbican' by a mapmaker or somone if this was the case, in the same way as seaton looks like 'sea town' but actually comes from the name of the river, seythen or something (this is probably completetly wrong word, this is all just from my rather inept memory) 131.111.8.104

Dead links...

3 dead links under "See also". JFYI. --None-of-the-Above (talk) 20:34, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Design info?

Can someone add some information on the design principles? What were these designed to protect against, how did they do so, and how was the design eventually attacked effectively enough that they became obsolete? What replaced them? ★NealMcB★ (talk) 22:20, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Barbican. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080424053133/http://www.barbicanliving.co.uk:80/h3a.html to http://www.barbicanliving.co.uk/h3a.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:25, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]