Talk:Banjo Paterson Writing Award

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Banjo Paterson Writing Award is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Literature Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Citations

I was a little perplexed by the template suggesting that there was a need for more citations for this article - if you look under the references there are actually 11 citations. I think that this is more than most articles would have. However, not to worry, in an abundance of caution, I will add more citations. Research17 (talk) 09:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fellow editors. By way of explanation, I've just added 4 references to the footnote, which results in 15 references in all for the article. Given this, I think it is reasonable to remove the more references template. One area where fellow editors might be able to assist is in the way there references are organized. I think it is good to have one reference, but I note that the last 4 sources are numbered. If any editor knows how to tweak this so that all sources are numbered within this reference, your assistance would be appreciated. Research17 (talk) 22:34, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]