Jump to content

Talk:Bangor, Gwynedd

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If you would like some advice on how to work this article, go on my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Say hior see my works) 01:42, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Dot in map

[edit]

Could someone sort the wonky red dot out? SP-KP 23:19, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel free to improve it . Mrs Trellis 22:36, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If I could figure out how, I would! SP-KP 17:53, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
What's wonky about it? It looks in the right place on my browser. -- Arwel (talk) 18:07, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
On mine, it appears above the article title, nowhere near the map. Same problem with Caernarfon, btw SP-KP 18:28, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Both are misplaced for me, too -- it appears just below the center of the title of the article, nowhere near the map. Mozilla 1.1 on Yellow Dog Linux on a Macintosh laptop. Same for Caernarfon. -- Mareklug talk 00:05, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Longest high street?

[edit]

In response to the removal of this claim, it is widely alleged that Bangor has the longest high street in Wales. I don't know anyone who has measured them all, although it is very long so it seems very believable to me.

If one does a Google search for "longest high street" wales bangor, one will find over 300 results, including, at the top, The Independent and UWB making this claim on their sites. I don't know if these sources count as relaible.

BTW, it is also widely alleged that it has the second highest ratio of pubs to population of any settlement in Britain.

--Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley talk contrib 20:51, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I reckon these sources are reliable enough. Now there's a source here on the talk page, I'm happy to revert my edit. CLW 21:30, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I can think of a number of places with virtually zero population, probably just the landlord and his wife, but with a pub so they are likely to have a higher ratio that Bangor. --jmb (talk) 00:08, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures

[edit]

Should the pictures at the bottom of the page have their own section rather than be under External Links? --jmb 08:26, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Beatles in Bangor

[edit]

BBC Wales has a feature and programme on the 40th anniversary of the visit to Bangor by The Beatles. [1]. The programme several times refers to them staying at Bangor Normal College, I always understood that they were staying at Neuadd Reichel. Which is correct? --jmb 13:00, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Percentage of Welsh speakers

[edit]

46.7% was changed to 76.7% with no obvious explanation (diff). The new figure appears incorrect, and other edits by this user appear to be tynnu coes, so I did correct the figure, and add a footnote with the correct figures from Cyfrifiad 2001. 80.68.82.115 (talk) 20:40, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yellow Pages

[edit]

The Bangor page is about the only one that I have seen on Wikipedia with so many listings of businesses, it is in danger of becoming a Yellow Pages. --jmb (talk) 01:12, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Duffy

[edit]

Surely the mention of Duffy's birthplace, who is not really considered to be that local, is utterly irrelevant to the article. I am a local resident, and I can say with confidence that Duffy's assocciation with Bangor is not particularly strong, and therefore the mention is unneccessary to the article. Hughesey2 (talk) 04:40, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see that Duffy has been put back in the list of people from Bangor. Was her family living in Bangor or was she just born at the C&A? If just born in the C&A then many of the people in Caernarfonshire will also end up listed as being from Bangor --jmb (talk) 10:58, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

The following is an exchange that has been conducted on talk pages but is better conducted here so that other editors may contribute.


Many thanks for your message " Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Bangor do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Velela Velela Talk 21:47, 14 July 2010 (UTC)"

I have looked through the guidelines you kindly provided and there is no mention of about limitations on the amount of links to official sites. It does mention that its forbidden to have a number of links relating to the subject by fan pages, etc... but I does not mention anything that you have raised above.

I feel after the hard work on providing the information to the website and to have the links removed in that manner was out of order and may prompt me to seek further advice from the administrators of Wikipedia as there is no evidence that you had the authority to move them.

The links have been re-instated and will remain until I can have some clarity on why such things should be removed. The links are not SPAMS! nor is it any sort of vandalisation to the content.

Making removals like this disgruntle a lot of contributors who are here to provide information and not to abuse it. Wikipedia have lost a lot of contributors very recently because of actions like this.

Maybe the solution to all this could be to create a new page titled 'lists of restaurants and pubs in Bangor, Gwynedd' but I guess you would object to that.

I understand you have been granted a reviewer for two months since last month, I congratulate you on that but I do feel you have just gone into the edit with one clean swipe and have dismissed the hard effort I have made to keep these links up to date. I have contributed a lot to the Bangor, Gwynedd page in the last few years and I suggest you should look at the history of improvements and information I have provided over the years.

I hope we can resolve this dispute as quickly as possible, kind regards, onshore

I removed all the links because they are quite clearly proscribed by WP:Spam#External_link_spamming , even the list of bars and pubs is itself suspect as being hardly encyclopaedic. Look at any other City article and few will contain such material. Check out St Asaph, St David's. Even Swansea has only three lines devoted to pubs and night-life. For most cities it would, in any case, be quite impossible to list every pub, nightclub restaurant etc. and as Wikipedia is not a travel guide, there is no need or use for such information. If one or two were especially notable or famous for a well established reason, then noting that reason and providing a reliable source for it might provide justification. As it is, my strong preference would be removal of the list (and its links) entirely. Past history in editing Wikipedia is not any reason for adding non-encyclopaedic material.  Velela  Velela Talk   19:16, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for you response.

I have read that link you have provided about Spam and as it quotes I see you may have got confused with this quote:"purpose of promoting a website or a product is not allowed". I can 100% confirm I am not promoting any websites. Just in the same way I am not promoting the School, Colleges and the University on the page. The external links I have provided are links to the official site, they are not to promote any product or company, hence how can it be classed as Spam? Do you live in Bangor or have visited there in the past? I am a resident of this place and was born in this city and have done my up most to keep this page up to date and providing useful links for further information. The lists of schools, colleges, restaurants, pubs, etc... have been listed on this site for a good 3 years now and I have not received any complaints of this. As you see every other city/town page is different in its own way.

Also you say places like Swansea on have a list of a few clubs, have you ever wondered if it could be that the members contributing to Swansea may not have had time to do the extensive research as I have made. Also in regard to your comment "For most cities it would, in any case, be quite impossible to list every pub, nightclub restaurant etc." I strongly disagree, this is just your way to dismiss the list of pubs that have been entered on the Bangor page. If it is impossible then how is there a definitive list of pubs/clubs/restaurants on the Bangor page?

You also say "even the list of bars and pubs is itself suspect as being hardly encyclopaedic" response to that the definition of an "encyclopaedia - a reference work that contains information on all branches of knowledge or treats comprehensively a specified branch of knowledge, usually in articles arranged in alphabetical order of subjects either in a single list or within each of several large subsections reference.iucr.org/dictionary/Interim_Report_of_Working_Group" In other words encyclopaedia is knowledge/information and as that statement says it can include absolutely anything even a list of pub names would count. As you see Wikipedia welcomes all contributors as they need every information there is to be had from the knowledge of the world population. To come out and say such things as "hardly encyclopaedic" when it is clearly information and knowledge. We all hold knowledge of certain topics others don't and I feel just because you feel listing pub names is "hardly encyclopaedic" doesn't mean its not.

Also if Wikipedia did not like the information on the Bangor page it would have automatically activated one of its bots to say that. I have seen it happen before so I know how they work.

I feel its unjustified to remove information just like that and I am extremely not happy in the mannerism that this has been brought to my attention. I understand that you are now a Reviewer for the next month at least but usually the normal procedure if your not happy with a page on Wikipedia is to place a box on the page. This is what all the others have done on other pages that have conflicting issues. onshore

I've removed those external links from the body of the article, since that's not where they would go even if they were relevant to the topic, not just tangential. I further suggest that they are at best tangential, and hence fall under what Wikipedia is not, specifically not a travel guide. I'm sorry if User:Onshore feels his work is wasted. --AndrewHowse (talk) 22:09, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So where would they go? Also to point out I am a male check my profile Onshore (talk) 22:33, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The website of a college might go on the page for that college, if and only if it were notable enough to have a page. Similarly for a bar or restaurant. --AndrewHowse (talk) 22:37, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
For example, the site for Bangor University is, quite reasonably, in the external links section of the page for the University. --AndrewHowse (talk) 22:42, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So what you are saying is that if I create a page for each pub/nightclub/restaurant then in theory I can place the external links in those pages and no one on here would have a hissy fit? Onshore (talk) 22:44, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm saying that if one of the pubs/clubs/restaurants merited a page, then the external link might well go in the external links section of that page. However, I suspect that most of them do not merit a page and would fail the general notability guideline.
btw, the usual convention on talk pages is to indent each reply beneath the last, with an extra leading semi-colon, like I did with my 2 responses immediately above your last. Not a big deal, but it makes it a bit easier to follow the thread. Cheers, --AndrewHowse (talk) 23:08, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, those sort of links/lists would be appropriate on an article on Bangor in WikiTravel, but not in Wikipedia. I have removed the lists. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 21:20, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There is a discussion on this at WP:EAR#External links. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 21:45, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive links - DMOZ solution implemented

[edit]

In light of the excessive number of links here, have implemented the DMOZ solution that we have used in a number of other similar cases, eg: Tenby. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 19:04, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Penrhyn Castle

[edit]

History

The present building was created between 1820 and 1840 to designs by Thomas Hopper, who expanded and transformed the building beyond recognition. However a spiral staircase from the original property can still be seen, and a vaulted basement and other masonry were incorporated into the new structure. Hopper's client was George Hay Dawkins-Pennant, who had inherited the Penrhyn estate on the death of his second cousin, Richard Pennant, who had made his fortune from Jamaican sugar and local slate quarries. The eldest of George's two daughters, Juliana, married Grenadier Guard, Edward Gordon Douglas, who, on inheriting the estate on George's death in 1845, adopted the hyphenated surname of Douglas-Pennant.

Penrhyn is one of the most admired of the numerous mock castles built in the United Kingdom in the 19th century; Christopher Hussey called it, "the outstanding instance of Norman revival." [1] The castle is a picturesque composition that stretches over 600 feet from a tall donjon containing family rooms, through the main block built around the earlier house, to the service wing and the stables.



Penrhyn Castle circa 1880. It is built in a sombre style which allows it to possess something of the medieval fortress air despite the ground-level drawing room windows. Hopper designed all the principal interiors in a rich but restrained Norman style, with much fine plasterwork and wood and stone carving. The castle also has some specially designed Norman style furniture, including a one ton slate bed made for Queen Victoria when she visited in 1859.

Hugh Napier Douglas-Pennant, 4th Lord Penrhyn, died in 1949, and the castle and estate passed to his niece, Lady Janet Pelham, who, on inheritance, adopted the surname of Douglas-Pennant. In 1951 the castle and 40,000 acres (160 km²) of land were accepted by the Treasury in lieu of death duties from Lady Janet. It now belongs to the National Trust and is open to the public.

Penrhyn's attractions include a formal walled garden, extensive informal gardens, a dolls museum, an industrial railway museum, a model railway museum and an adventure playground. Hanging on its walls is one of the finest art collections in North Wales, with works by artists such as Rembrandt - (Catrina Hooghsaet, valued at up to £40m, the Dutch Culture Ministry tried to buy the painting for Amsterdam’s Rijksmuseum in 2007 but couldn’t meet the asking price)- , Canaletto, Richard Wilson, Carl Haag, Perino del Vaga and Palma Vecchio. The family began collecting paintings from the early years of the 19th century; this significant collection was catalogued by the 2nd Lord Penrhyn's daughter Alice Douglas-Pennant. The castle has views over the Snowdonia mountains. In 2008/09 it was the National Trust's thirteenth most visited paid-entry property, with 156,575 visitors.

[edit] Cost

The cost of the construction of this vast 'castle' is disputed, and very difficult to work out accurately as much of the timber came from the family's own forestry, and much of the labour was acquired from within their own workforce at the slate quarry. It has been estimated that it cost the Pennant Family about £150,000. This is the approximate equivalent to about £49,500,000. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.21.203.13 (talk) 23:49, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bangor, Gwynedd. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:03, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notable people

[edit]

Hello. If "Notable people" are added to this article by virtue of their residency or association with Bangor, they absolutely must be accompanied by a reliable secondary source that describes their connection. We cannot be relied on to follow a wikilink to their article and make the determination there: Wikipedia is not a source for itself. Thanks! 2600:8800:1880:91E:5604:A6FF:FE38:4B26 (talk) 03:35, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bangor Mountain and Sunlight

[edit]

There was a claim on the page that parts of Bangor High Street received no direct sunlight from November to March. Someone placed a citation request on this 10 years ago in 2009, and no one has provided a source. I have searched and the only sources I can find appear to be derived from this page (or the Bangor Mountain Wikipedia page). Without a source, a contentious claim should be removed.

Before removing, I went to Google street view to take a look at the High Street. Only a small portion of the High Street at the Northern end is overshadowed by Bangor Mountain, and you can see it here: https://www.google.com/maps/@53.2296838,-4.1191018,3a,75y,90h,89.8t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sxCERGa7RxOjBijvnqzfeGw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192 In this specific short section of the High Street, Bangor Mountain lies to the South, and it is probably true that beyond the equinox, when the sun is rising to the south of East and sets south of West, this part of the High Street would get no direct sunlight. However the stretch is very short, and really it is not that unusual. There are plenty of places like this.

So while I think it is probably true, and actually not very contentious, I think the claim fails on notability grounds. There do not appear to be any published sources remarking on this, because it is not that remarkable. If anyone can find a source that does treat this as remarkable, the material could be returned, but in its absence, the claim does not belong in this article. -- Sirfurboy (talk) 19:02, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My personal experience of having visited Bangor many times and having lived there, is that much of the high street is in shadow for most of the winter. It is also reported often by students. You forget that the street is usually very close to the foot of the mountain, and Bangor mountain itself is virtually a cliff in some parts. There is a new hall of residence on the high street and 6?? stories tall that does not see over the mountain. A quick view on Google street view will confirm this : from St. Marys on top of the mountain, you cannot even see the high street. I know of no other town in the UK, except Edinbouugh, where there is a cliff overlooking the high street. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.201.149.11 (talk) 22:47, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this. Again, looking at Google Maps, I see that the shopping precinct is overlooked by shops, not Bangor Mountain.[[2]]. This is my experience of shopping in Bangor. You are not particularly aware of the mountain at that point but it is closer in the stretch I quoted. There are many sections of shopping streets in the UK that get no direct sunlight owing to tall buildings (the shops), so the claim does not seem that unusual. The closeness of Bangor Mountain is a little unusual, but I can think of several other Welsh towns built close to steep hills and cliffs. I am not disputing the truth of the claim, but only its notability. Going forward, the information could certainly be reinserted into the article if there is a source (not derived from Wikipedia) that treats this claim as notable. For instance, a book about Bangor perhaps? I would add that the dates on the claim are clearly wrong. The equinoxes are 21 March and 21 September, so the shadow must either fall from, say, the beginning of October to mid March to the beginning of November to mid February, or indeed the middle of November to the end of January or somesuch. Any claim of November to March is unlikely to lead back to a verified source. -- Sirfurboy (talk) 23:03, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Population

[edit]

I have just undone a good faith edit that reads:

The population in 1841 was 7,232.[1]

The information is likely true, and is sourced. However it is rather random! Why do we need to know the 1841 population and not any other year? So I put it to talk here to discuss whether we want to include anything on historical growth of the population, or whether there is any reason why 1841 should be of note. -- Sirfurboy (talk) 23:02, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a very late reply, but the obvious answer is that 1841 was the year of the first effective census in the UK and somebody may have simply added up all the head-counts for Bangor. Probably appropriate and also probably relevant but also probably WP:OR - so I guess it is take it or leave it.  Velella  Velella Talk   17:59, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ The National Cyclopaedia of Useful Knowledge, Vol.III, London, Charles Knight, p.1,017

Requested move 18 December 2020

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure) BegbertBiggs (talk) 20:42, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Bangor, Gwynedd → Bangor, Wales – Per Perth, Scotland. Unreal7 (talk) 17:15, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • ’’’Strong oppose’’’. There is no need for this. Perth was named that because it would an unwieldy title. The council area’s name being the same as that of the settlement is why Lincoln and Perth are titled as being in England and Scotland instead of Lincolnshire and Perth and Kinross, respectively. There is no such thing with Bangor. Velociraptor888 20:21, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Disambiguation (Bangor, USA)

[edit]

There should be disambiguation between this page and Bangor, Maine, USA.

(Or perhaps the new format now hides the disambiguation.) 216.106.104.39 (talk) 22:51, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notable People - Owen Hurcum

[edit]

Bangor's Former Mayor Owen Hurcum appears a lot in this article for their influence on the city, and their picture accompanying the notable people section seems to over-emphasise their importance in Bangor. Could the many poets and other notables not be presented instead? Wayne Knight's No. 1 Fan (talk) 18:40, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mayoral mace

[edit]

[3] - may be worth a footnote to the Wartski section in Retail. KJP1 (talk) 06:07, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Standard English pronunciation

[edit]

Once again Standard English pronunciation was removed here? Seems somewhat contentious. Has this been agreed for all articles with a Welsh name? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 14:39, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bangor,_Gwynedd&oldid=1205697407"