Talk:Bang Bang (Green Day song)

Bang Bang (Green Day song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 20, 2017	Guild of Copy Editors	Copyedited
May 14, 2017	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 4, 2017.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Green Day's 2016 song "Bang Bang" was inspired by the events of mass shootings in the United States and is written from the viewpoint of a mass shooter?

Current status: Good article

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Green Day (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Green Day, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Green DayWikipedia:WikiProject Green DayTemplate:WikiProject Green DayGreen Day articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bang Bang (Green Day song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: DannyMusicEditor (talk · contribs) 22:48, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I like this song. It's short enough for me to speed through a review over the weekend, provided you're ready. If you're not, just let me know when you are, I can understand when someone nominates a GAN prematurely and wants to fix it during nomination waiting; this was only up since April 24. If you'd like, you could take a look at my FAC for Fightstar. dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 22:48, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking it up DannyMusicEditor. I nominated it once I was done adding all the material I could find and after receiving copy-edits from the GOCE. I am available to address any concerns over the weekend. Cheers, — Yash^talk stalk 02:58, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All links working according to Checklinx.
Copyvio isn't a big issue. The one that does use the most however, says "NME blog"...I need to confirm this is reliable. be back later.
All the genres you have cited should be in the article somewhere, preferably reception, and not cited in the infobox. Punk rock is already this way.
"Still Breathing" is missing ""s in the chronology.
Perhaps link "Letterbomb" to the American Idiot tracklist?
Did the source call the party scene in the video a "wild" house party? If not, change that because it's the personal opinion of an editor, which doesn't belong here.
That's all, really.

Honestly, I find myself having very little to complain about here. Good job! dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 12:02, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Missing source for track listen. Otherwise great job actually. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 16:14, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry Mario, what is it you're referring to? Please be more specific. dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 18:54, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Cd single and download digital have no source? MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 15:34, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

They're sourced in the body, but I suppose adding a ref tag there would be a reasonable request. dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 18:53, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If they are already its fine then. I noticed some issues regarding the references, Fuse is linked twice, billboard not even once...take a closer look at that. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 13:41, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DannyMusicEditor, I have addressed all the issues mentioned above. Let me know if there is anything more to be done. Thank you for your review. Best, — Yash^talk stalk 06:01, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Pass dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 16:47, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]