Jump to content

Talk:Ball Ground, Georgia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ball Ground, Georgia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:42, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of recent history addition

[edit]

@Magnolia677: I wanted to discuss the edit you made and try to work that out, because the fact that Cherokee lived there but were removed and the land given out is an important part of how Ball Ground came to be. Your edit summary says that “none of the sources mention Ball Ground” but I have to disagree. The very first source in that section specifically mentions Ball Ground within the first sentence. The second source does not mention Ball Ground because the Cherokee were removed from the whole county; there's no reason to single out the area of Ball Ground and while it's true that this part is not specifically unique to Ball Ground, it does apply to Ball Ground and more specifically provides context for the next part, which ‘’does’’ discuss Ball Ground, albeit not by name. this source about the land lottery does not mention Ball Ground because it is impossible for it to do so; it is a contemporary source. If you’ll notice it does not mention ‘’any’’ city in what is now Cherokee County, because nothing existed or was named there at the time except for the carved out county names. However the general map on page 16 and the more detailed map on page 66 does describe the land that is now Ball Ground (it’s around grid marker 55). They don’t call it by name because it didn’t have a name, but the source does describe Ball Ground’s lands and how they were distributed via the land lottery, and that context is important for the history of the town. The last source that was removed just verifies the treaty information to give context to the timetable. But there is a source in each of those paragraphs that mentions Ball Ground (or describes the land that will become Ball Ground) so it is cited and relevant to the article, and because of that I think it needs to be reinserted into the article, especially because it makes following sections that use sources that explicitly mention the Cherokee returning to Ball Ground seem without context if the article doesn't mention that they were ever there or that they left. - Aoidh (talk) 23:43, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Aoidh: Thank you for writing. I missed the reference to "Ball Ground" in the first source because it was spelled differently. Please add back information about the Battle of Taliwa and any other information specific to Ball Ground. My concern on this and many articles is that information added is too broad and not specific to the city, and would be more appropriate on an article about the county. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 07:48, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for getting back with me. I'm assuming you have no objection to the second paragraph that discusses the land lottery since the source does describe Ball Ground without actually using the words "Ball Ground", so based on that assumption I'm going to re-add both paragraphs, but I'll tweak them a bit and add the source that mentions how the Cherokee later returned to Ball Ground as verification that they were there to leave in the first place, if that makes sense. - Aoidh (talk) 08:27, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Ball Ground, Georgia/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 21:08, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs)

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

[edit]

Prose

[edit]

Lede

[edit]

General

[edit]

Review meta comments

[edit]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk14:12, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by Aoidh (talk). Self-nominated at 21:49, 12 October 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: @Aoidh: Great article. Though for hook one i'd propose ... that Ball Ground, Georgia was named what it is because the land was originally used by Native Americans to play stickball? or something like that because just saying "was named" seems like a grammar mistake. I'm not too sure though so i'm waiting on your approval. Onegreatjoke (talk) 22:46, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Onegreatjoke: I was trying to figure out how best to word that so I'm more than open to suggestions. What about ..."that Ball Ground, Georgia was so named because the land..."? - Aoidh (talk) 22:49, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Aoidh: Maybe we could do ... that Ball Ground, Georgia got its name because the land... Onegreatjoke (talk) 22:52, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Onegreatjoke: That works for me, I've updated the first hook accordingly, thanks. - Aoidh (talk) 22:56, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Aoidh: Alright then, I approve the nomination. Onegreatjoke (talk) 22:57, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:51, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gibbs Gardens?

[edit]

Why is Gibbs Gardens mentioned as being inside the city? Anyone looking at a map can tell it is quite a distance from the incorporated city limits. It may be within the USPS ZIP Code area (30107), but that ZIP covers quite a large part of the county, well outside of the city. — TadgStirkland401 (TadgTalk) 09:01, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because we use what reliable sources to determine content, and reliable sources (example) describe it as being in Ball Ground. - Aoidh (talk) 19:53, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recent changes

[edit]

@TadgStirkland401: I've reverted the formatting changes introduced, as per MOS:VAR the formatting style should not be changed to another formatting (in this case the line breaks after each parameter and moving infobox citations to the end) if it is used consistently in an article, as it is here. The changes to the lede are less concise and are not an improvement, wikilinking things like United States is a MOS:OVERLINK concern, and while the names of additional city officials like city manage is and should be discussed in the government section for US cities, that level of governing does not need to go into the infobox. - Aoidh (talk) 20:16, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aoidh… What can I say? I tried… Did you also revert the obvious grammar errors I fixed? — TadgStirkland401 (TadgTalk) 21:14, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Motto(s)

[edit]

The infobox contains a motto(s) entry with a citation to the official Ball Ground website. It states the motto as “Where we roll out the red carpet, not the red tape". I have searched the site and the motto is not mentioned anywhere. Should this reference be removed? — TadgStirkland401 (TadgTalk) 01:47, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It probably should be removed or updated. The website did previously show this at the top up until around 2021, but it looks like that changed to Historic Past − Bright Future some time in the last couple of years. - Aoidh (talk) 05:59, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]