Talk:Balize (tug)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States / American Civil War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	American Civil War task force

Merger

I think the destination article should Balize (tug) , because the USS Bignonia is a lot shorter, and is unlikely to be expanded. Please consider this. User:GreatLakesShips (talk) 22:45, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merged articles

I've merged the article USS Bignonia with this one (left tag on just in case I did it wrong)

Merge with USS Bignonia (1863) ?

We've got two articles on the same vessel. A merge seems obvious, but what should the destination article be named? Andy Dingley (talk) 18:17, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this, don't simply remove the merge tag, or else I'm just going to tag it for WP:CSD#A10 Andy Dingley (talk) 21:21, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Engines?

For an 1863 vessel, a steeple engine seems more likely than a steeple compound engine. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:17, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Original naming?

I suspect this was Mary Grandy, rather than Grandy Mary.[1] Andy Dingley (talk) 18:19, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You were right, it was Mary Grandy. Thanks for pointing it out. User:GreatLakesShips (talk) 12:8, 20 January 2018 (UTC)