Jump to content

Talk:Bald–hairy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Bald – hairy)

Opening heading

[edit]

Is the spacing on either side of the en dash necessary? Neither element has a space within itself; according to MOS:ENDASH no additional space is necessary. Daniel Case (talk) 17:57, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Russian Leaders Matriochka.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Russian Leaders Matriochka.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:53, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Andropov and Prince Lvov

[edit]

Neither Andropov nor Prince Lvov, both in this list as 'bald', were in fact bald. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.223.13.73 (talk) 23:03, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Andropov was partially bald (stage 4A or thereabouts on Norwood scale). --Itinerant1 (talk) 01:01, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Originally this joke referred to the soviet era only, and the first one in the sequence was Lenin. Also, Lvov and Andropov (as well as Kerensky and Chernenko) were short-term leaders and thus are somewhat minor figures of Russian history, in comparison to the rest of the leaders. See the image of matryoshkas: all four are missing from the set. Andrey Kartashov (talk) 17:48, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

A link was removed by User:Greyhood [1] due to presuuposed unreliability of blog sources. I strongly believe it should be restored: though published in a blog, it's an interview with a prominent Russian cartoonist Denis Osokin, hold by a professional reporter, and the blog is not some random personal page, but a column at the website of Echo Moskvy, a popular Russian broadcaster. Andrey Kartashov (talk) 18:13, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved it from inline citations to external links as there was need to do so for DYK posting. Feel free to re-add it inline if you find it appropriate. GreyHood Talk 11:46, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:09, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bald–hairyBald – hairy The article is not about a bold-hairy creature, but about a sequence of distinct bald and hairy men. Spacing also corresponds to the usage in Russian. GreyHood Talk 17:49, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Bald - Full head of hair?

[edit]

Hairy means "with a lot of hair". That's not what 'volosatyj' means in Russian, so is the title really accurate? "Full head of hair" seems more appropriate. Not punchy, but appropriate. Malick78 (talk) 18:31, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't think so. 'Volosatyj' can also refer to body hair. For example, "hairy legs" is "volosatyje nogi". "Hairy" is a perfectly appropriate translation. 194.226.199.61 (talk) 11:04, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Missing people

[edit]

In the brief interim period between Stalin and Khrushchev there were two interim Heads of State. First bald Beria, then hairy Malenkov. Thus the sequence goes ...Stalin(hairy)-Beria(bald)-Malnkov(hairy)-Khrushchev(bald)... 41.133.47.225 (talk) 09:27, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done, 6 years later. Sir Magnus (talk) 14:06, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Putin's two photos

[edit]

There should be two different photos of Putin. The first should be a photo of him in 2000 and the second in 2012. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.160.91.217 (talk) 21:33, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander II

[edit]

Surely he is balding? john k (talk) 13:29, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That is an unfortunate portrait. Isn't there one of him when he came to the throne? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.133.0.18 (talk) 08:05, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is a year after his accession in 1856: link can someone create a crop of it? Robef (talk) 23:00, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Definitely looks much better with that picture. Zell Faze (talk) 16:18, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could this have a better title...

[edit]

?--Jack Upland (talk) 08:48, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chernenko is missing.

[edit]

Chernenko is missing. That's why pattern is broken after Andropov. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.222.99.106 (talk) 22:35, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

His picture was removed because of copyright concerns, and then he was deleted. I have restored him, with the picture that is used for his article. Apparently the picture is acceptable there, so it should be OK here. If there is no acceptable picture, he shouldn't be deleted because that would break the pattern, as pointed out above.--Jack Upland (talk) 04:43, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
He has now been deleted again. It is irrational to delete him entirely merely because of the picture. Leave the picture off if you must, but don't delete the mention of Chernenko because it breaks the pattern and disappears part of history.--Jack Upland (talk) 17:03, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jack, I agree. I’ve added him back in sans photo - hopefully he’ll remain this time. Ardeninian (talk) 22:34, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:37, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:54, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:23, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

“most likely”?!

[edit]

“While this pattern is most likely a coincidence, it has held true since 1825”

Erm - what universe would we be in if this were not a coincidence? (20040302 (talk) 14:30, 30 August 2021 (UTC))[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:07, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:07, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:23, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]