Talk:Bad Case of Loving You (Doctor, Doctor)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Bad Case of Loving You (Doctor, Doctor). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160305064644/http://www.austchartbook.com.au/ to http://www.austchartbook.com.au/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141006134948/http://australian-charts.com/forum.asp?todo=viewthread&id=40275 to http://australian-charts.com/forum.asp?todo=viewthread&id=40275
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304060014/http://50.6.195.142/archives/70s_files/1979YESP.html to http://50.6.195.142/archives/70s_files/1979YESP.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:53, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
Cover arts (again)
[edit]@JGabbard: I made some improvements to the article. I think you and I might compromise. However, you and I disagree over which image to use. I thought about taking the images to the FFD and wait for the consensus. I don't like back-and-forth (or circular) arguments anymore. That made me look bad, and that would repel others away. You prefer the Dutch or the French; I prefer the British. Nevertheless, I think the FFD is the best venue, so consensus there may be reached to decide which image to use. Thoughts? --George Ho (talk) 04:41, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
I'll rephrase: whatever the decision the consensus decides, I'll accept reluctantly. British or Dutch, I'll accept, regardless of my preference. George Ho (talk) 04:50, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
After thinking, a result may be no consensus but delete the third image if the participants (besides us) would not agree with which one(s) to keep. --George Ho (talk) 05:51, 17 February 2017 (UTC)