Jump to content

Talk:Baclayon Church

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Baclayon Church/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 23W (talk · contribs) 00:15, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Comments

[edit]
Clarified. --Carlojoseph14 (talk) 15:07, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • The Manual of Style suggests the lead should be two paragraphs. The last sentence by itself can probably be merged into the preceding paragraph.
Done. Merged. --Carlojoseph14 (talk) 15:07, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • The two one-sentence paragraphs in the history section should probably be merged into the preceding paragraphs, if logical.
Done. Merged. I think it is logical --Carlojoseph14 (talk) 15:07, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Regarding the headings, is "Retablo" supposed to be capitalized? It's set in lowercase in the body and captions.
Noted, changes done. --Carlojoseph14 (talk) 15:07, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Some redundant in-line citations can probably be eliminated (i.e., remove references from the end of consecutive sentences if they're the same reference number).
Noted, changes done. --Carlojoseph14 (talk) 15:07, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Toolbox tools turned up nothin' major, so that's good.

Nice work for a beautiful church; sad about the earthquake. ;( On hold for two weeks. 23W 00:40, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@23W:, Please see my reply after each comments. Thanks. --Carlojoseph14 (talk) 15:07, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @23W:, you might want to review the nomination. Thanks. --Carlojoseph14 (talk) 14:25, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Carlojoseph14: Sorry for the wait! I've been tremendously busy, but I'll have a follow-up soon. 23W 23:26, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Carlojoseph14: Changes look good. I've made the following revisions here; they mostly involve grammar and minor MOS things. (Finally) passing this now; thank you for being patient with me over this month! 23W 22:14, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Baclayon Church. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:51, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Baclayon Church. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:19, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

English

[edit]

Baclayon church body 175.176.67.97 (talk) 16:53, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Baclayon_Church&oldid=1205595229"