Talk:Backlash (2002)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Backlash (2002) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Professional wrestling Low‑importance

	Backlash (2002) is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kansas City Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kansas City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about Kansas City, Missouri, and the surrounding metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Kansas CityWikipedia:WikiProject Kansas CityTemplate:WikiProject Kansas CityKansas City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Missouri Low‑importance

	Missouri portal This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Professional wrestling#Pinfall|pinfall]] The anchor (#Pinfall) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
[[Professional wrestling#Pinfall|pin]] The anchor (#Pinfall) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
[[Professional wrestling#Knockout|knockout]] The anchor (#Knockout) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
[[Professional wrestling#Disqualification|disqualification]] The anchor (#Disqualification) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Minor edit to Results

I made a slight edit to the Brock Lesnar vs. Jeff Hardy match, as it was reflected that Paul Heyman was managing Brock but it simply read "Brock Lesnar (with Paul Heyman) defeated Jeff Hardy" with no mention of Lita accompanying Jeff, so I simply added "(with Lita)" to the result, as it is more accurate now than before. You can find at least *ONE* video of the match from Backlash 2002 on Dailymotion, don't know about anywhere else, but watch the vid and you WILL see Lita accompanying Jeff, so please do not change the result for this match. Thank-You.98.209.57.0 (talk) 09:35, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of telling people to watch illegally hosted videos, you could have told them to look at WWE's site where they mention Lita being there: [1]. That is the ONLY reason I didn't keep the info off (illegally hosted videos, which covers all WWE stuff on YouTube and Dailymotion, are not allowed). TJ Spyke 21:04, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What happened at the actual event?

I've noticed that this article has a section called "Background", which covers what happened at the event, and a section called "Aftermath", which covers what happened after the event... but unlike most other WWE event pages, there's no section for the event itself. I'm not particularly sure why that is, if whoever wrote the before and after sections just neglected to write something for the event itself, or if that section was at some point written but was excised for some reason. Either way, it's kinda sloppy for the article of event to have sections on before and after the even, but no section covering the event the article is for itself. (And, ugh, I can't believe I'm asking for a paragraph to be written about a notoriously bad event. I don't have a citation for that claim... but I don't think I need one.) --Jermdeeks (talk) 04:56, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]