Talk:Bachmannia woodii

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

On 23 September 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Bachmannia to Bachmannia woodii. The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 23 September 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Reading Beans 14:02, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bachmannia → Bachmannia woodii – The name "Bachmannia" is shared by two monospecific genera: a plant genus (this article) and a fish genus (Bachmannia chubutensis). I don't think either is the primary topic, so they should both be disambiguated. Per WP:MONOTYPICFLORA, it's better to add the specific name than a parenthetical disambiguator like "Bachmannia (plant)". jlwoodwa (talk) 22:56, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Bachmannia chubutensis has 21 views compared with only 9[[1]] for Bachmannia woodii. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:47, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Not controversial per WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA. YorkshireExpat (talk) 19:15, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.