Talk:Bacchus Ladies

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bacchus Ladies article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sexology and sexuality: Sex work Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Sex work task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Requires attention

IT MEANS KOREAN MILF. WTF IS BACCHUS LADIES. YOU MEAN KOREAN MILF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hardkr (talk • contribs) 11:30, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs cleanup to make it better English as it currently isn't. Example: "is Korean older prostitutes", "recent rapid change of society, the attitude has changed dramatically". Some parts of this article just don't read well.

I think it also needs a bit of a look at to help improve the article generally, for example, the Background section doesn't explain what it has to do with the article topic, starting with "In a Confucian society like South Korea..."

Help would be appreciated, this is just a bit too much for me. Thanks. Seagull123 Φ 12:34, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are not familiar with the Korean related articles. The descriptions you raised as examples are described in the BBC source. That said, I corrected a bit for readers unfamiliar with this subject. As for the templates you tagged, notability is supported by the BBC News and The Korea Times and all the descriptions in the article are supported by the sources provided. Please try to find what description is not supported by the sources given. Hence I removed the tags.―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 03:01, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bacchus Ladies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150708130659/http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2015/03/116_175997.html to http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2015/03/116_175997.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:40, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]