Talk:Ayodhyapuri

Nepal Low‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ayodhyapuri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081012163506/http://www.digitalhimalaya.com/collections/nepalcensus/form.php?selection=1 to http://www.digitalhimalaya.com/collections/nepalcensus/form.php?selection=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:33, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Palace of Ayodhya

If it is true, then where is location of Lord Rama's palace in Nepal ? AbhayMahadik (talk) 05:15, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May be under construction. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by AbhayMahadik (talk • contribs) 05:15, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aayodhya

Birthplace of God Ram. Nsapkota (talk) 19:40, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Birthplace of God Ram, Aayodhyapuri, Chitawan Nepal. Nsapkota (talk) 19:43, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sources please! --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:52, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Archeological Study

Department of Archeology has started study regarding the birthplace of lord Ram. Bhattarai1237 (talk) 18:14, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Let us know the outcome. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:49, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bhattarai1237: A couple of points. Since there is clearly more than one place that is claimed to be the birthplace of Rama, you cannot say "known to be". Ayodhyapuri is one candidate amongst at least two possible places. Secondly, your formulation makes little sense. What do you mean by "trace out evidences"? Evidence is used both for the plural as well as the singular. And using "trace out" as the verb here is not accurate either. You should say "search for evidence" or "look for evidence" instead. And, one presumes, that the department in question is begining an excavation, not a study. Last, but not the least, you might want to read WP:NPA. You should try not to presume biases in other editors. --RegentsPark (comment) 16:21, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't mention 'is the birthplace ' .I mentioned 'is known as birthplace ' and I know other places are also known as birthplace of Lord Ram. Bhattarai1237 (talk) 16:32, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you can't say "known to be one of the birthplaces of Rama" because a person, even a mythological one, cannot have been born in multiple places. You have to use some mechanism for expressing that this is one possible candidate birthplace. Hence my formulation: "Ayodhyapuri is one of the places thought to be the birthplace of the Hindu deity Rama". Also, the points above which need addressing ("evidences", excavation, etc.). I forgot to add that, since our article Ram Janambhoomi is associated with a specific location, your text appears to say that any evidence found by the digs will support Ayodhya as the birthplace of Ram. I'm pretty sure that's not your intention. Your choices are to drop the explicit reference to Ram Janambhoomi or edit that article so that its focus is on all possible birthplaces, not just the one in Ayodhya. --RegentsPark (comment) 17:58, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bhattarai1237: I've explained to you why your version is not acceptable. Either see if you can change consensus here, on the talk page, or stop reverting. --RegentsPark (comment) 16:26, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]