Jump to content

Talk:Awards in the Willem C. Vis International Commercial Arbitration Moot

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I find it irritating that the ranking lists all teams that won the oral rounds before teams that won other awards regardless of the number of awards won. A university that won the oral rounds once is not more successful in the overall competition than a university that won four awards for their memoranda. I do accept that the award for the best team in the oral rounds designates the "winner of the moot" and should in case of a tie be worth more than awards for the memoranda which in turn are worth more than the award for the best individual speaker (since it is no team award). But only in case of a tie in number of awards.

Further, the list that gives the teams that won the most "awards" in each year is highly misleading as it treats awards, runner-ups, and honourable mentions alike. E.g. in the 14th Vis Moot Stetson is listed as having won the most awards with 5 (i.e. one honourable mention for a memorandum, a second place and three honourable mentions for individual speakers) while Freiburg has won three awards (i.e. both memoranda and the best team in the oral rounds while not even participating in the individual speaker's award). Such ranking is just giving an incorrect impression of the respective universities' success in the Vis Moot. This is not information but misinformation and should not be distributed by wikipedia.

131.152.133.35 (talk) 13:00, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Awards in the Willem C. Vis International Commercial Arbitration Moot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:40, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Awards in the Willem C. Vis International Commercial Arbitration Moot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:54, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]