Talk:Auxiliaries

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	National militaries task force

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Home Guard (United Kingdom)#Official Recognition|Women's Home Defence]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

No auxiliary branch of the United States military has authority

... for either direct military or direct law enforcement. The meaning of "Auxiliary" depends on which organization you refer to -- which suggests this article doesn't belong in the English version. (Text near the top of the article refers to another country). The article about Civil Air Patrol and United States Coast Guard auxiliary branch refer to a federal "charter" of some sort. Neither cites the particular Chapter in the Code of Federal Regulations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.122.82.150 (talk) 08:08, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References

I noticed a number of references are the url to a Google Book link. I though editors might be interested in a tool which takes a link as input and creates a (usually) properly formatted ref.

Wikipedia citation tool for Google Books

I used it to improve one such reference.

It really helps creates a much cleaner list of references. I hope you will try it.--S Philbrick (Talk) 21:49, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Auxiliaries. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071026201045/http://www.ospreypublishing.com/title_detail.php/title=T0684~view=extract to http://www.ospreypublishing.com/title_detail.php/title=T0684~view=extract

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:51, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Historical/GB

The Hessians should certainly be included in the historial British Empire. Probably the Gurkha and Sikhs_in_the_British_Indian_Army as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.100.188.53 (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]