Talk:Autodesk Revit

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Software: Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

Move from Revit Architecture to Revit

I think it's just plain wrong to call this page Revit Architecture. Revit Architecture is one of three programs in the Revit family. I accept that RAC is better known than Structure or MEP, but that doesn't change the facts. I suggest a move back to Revit and a reorganisation of the article so the three platforms are explained separately. I see that Wikipedia:Requested_moves has a big backlog so I won't bother them. If I don't hear cries of protest I'll move this sometime in the future --duncan.lithgow (talk) 00:32, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wait a second. 1. What's the difference between Revit Building and Revit Architecture? If there are two softwares named Revit there should be such a move. 2. You really should tag a {{subst:requested move|Revit}} in this page.

Invalid Link

I don't have time right now to fix it, but the link under Products to "Building Design Suites" is invalid. Psubrian (talk) 19:42, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: the page has been moved to Autodesk Revit as agreed below. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:38, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Autodesk Revit Architecture → Revit – for duncan.lithgow - 110.232.42.149 (talk) 14:35, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- There is no such thing as Revit Building, what are you refering to? There is Revit software platform which is available in three 'flavours': Revit Architecture, Revit Structure and Revit MEP. These products have been / are (I'm not quite sure at the moment) available separately. Now in 2013 you can also buy Revit All-in-one / One Box which includes the functionality of all platforms in one application. That's a good example of how the difference between these platforms are not extensive. I'm sorry if I'm ignorant of the procedures for moving a page, what are you referring to with {{subst:requested move|Revit}}? Did I use the wrong tag (did I even use a tag?) Is there something wrong with the way I'm proposing this change? Thanks for adding the tag to this conversation, are there more formalities we should observe? --duncan.lithgow (talk) 15:13, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Revit Building 9 --110.232.42.149 (talk) 16:44, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - Thanks for that link, but if you look at the build numbers and PDFs you'll see that you're looking at a product from 2006. Why Autodesk is so lazy with cleaning up their website is a mystery, I've often had similar problems trying to find out what the current version of something is... Here are two links to the history of Revit http://bimboom.blogspot.dk/2007/02/revit-history_11.html http://forums.augi.com/showthread.php?20803-Revit-Timeline-%28W-I-P-%29 You can see how the products fit together in 2012/2013 here: http://usa.autodesk.com/revit/how-to-buy/ --duncan.lithgow (talk) 21:28, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Do you mean Revit Building is a former name of Revit Architecture? Or it's a tool in Revit Architecture? Then it should be mentioned in the article. --222.35.187.25 (talk) 13:32, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- it was renamed. I've added that info to the history section (which needs a cleanup) --duncan.lithgow (talk) 09:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do you still consider this as a controversial or potentially controversial move? --duncan.lithgow (talk) 21:28, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder whether we should have 3 different article, one of whom named Autodesk Revit Architecture, or we should place all content in one article named Revit Series. --222.35.187.25 (talk) 13:32, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- As Ive said before the differences between RAC,RST and RMEP are so few compared to what they have in common that I think they should remain in one article unless some people knowledgable of the difference and willing to write them up begins to contribute. I hope to add something about the differences in the future but I've found it tricky because the function are always changing. So I say one article called simply Autodesk Revit, with some clarification of differences. --duncan.lithgow (talk) 09:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thank you! I agree with the move. --110.232.42.149 (talk) 03:36, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - Great. I won't make this move until I have time to adjust the text appropriately and add section for the three flavours. --duncan.lithgow (talk) 05:45, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Web site

http://www.revit-basics.com/revithistory.html is suspended --Palapa (talk) 10:29, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The URL is long gone. Internet Archive has a couple backups and none of them appear to be perfect: https://web.archive.org/web/20120701000000*/http://www.revit-basics.com/revithistory.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by MEP1697 (talk • contribs) 17:15, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Autodesk Revit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:33, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]