Talk:Auto-Lite strike (1934)

A fact from Auto-Lite strike (1934) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 April 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Auto-Lite Strike culminated in the "Battle of Toledo," a five-day melee between 6,000 striking workers and 1,300 members of the Ohio National Guard that left two dead and more than 200 injured?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/April.

Wikipedia

United States: Ohio Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio.

Visual arts: Public art

	Visual arts portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
	This article is supported by the public art task force.

Organized Labour High‑importance

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been selected for the Organized Labour Portal Article Of The Day for April 12.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Auto-Lite strike (1934) be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Ohio may be able to help!
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on May 23, 2013, May 23, 2017, May 23, 2022, and May 23, 2024.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Auto-Lite strike. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070609091814/http://www.bgsu.edu/colleges/library/cac/ms0078a.html to http://www.bgsu.edu/colleges/library/cac/ms0078a.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:47, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Auto-Lite strike. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070825234317/http://www.library.ucsb.edu/speccoll/csdi/a7600.html to http://www.library.ucsb.edu/speccoll/csdi/a7600.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:39, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Updating a source with dates.

I'm not quite sure how to list references to include page numbers. Source 1 is found on pages 218-229 of the source given Benito Juarez 10 (talk) 06:08, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprofessional language

The paragraph before the section titled “aftermath” reads poorly, and seems to be unprofessional. As the line stands at the moment, it needs to be changed. Benito Juarez 10 (talk) 07:39, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Citation not accurate

I feel as if the Burnstein book is not cited in a good way and could be improved. The citation created by the auto generator seems to be far better, and more accurate, and will likely go with that Benito Juarez 10 (talk) 07:56, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]