Jump to content

Talk:Authoritarian socialism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I think the quote referring to 'Stalinist Soviet Union' and 'Maoist China' is biased as there is no reference provide for either state being undemocratic. A more neutral tone should be taken articulating that these states have been referred to as such, mentioning that these states referred to each themselves consistently as democratic for their own class. SpaceLenin (talk) 20:41, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This article is still heavily biased

[edit]

This article is still heavily biased and uses very suspect sources. It is also very concerning to see a page editor referring to Mao Zedong as 'Zedong': Chinese names do not work like that, and it is inappropriate to use a personal name when talking about a political leader. I think that whoever wrote this article did not have neutrality in mind and lacked quite a bit of the requisite knowledge to meaningfully contribute. 58.172.104.2 (talk) 15:39, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Authoritarian socialism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:20, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merging with state socialism

[edit]

Isn't both Authoritarian Socialism and State Socialism implementations of socialist philosophies with the government holding the means of production? Every self described "Socialist State" (both current and former) have/had an authoritarian regime, almost all of them single-party. So isn't it correct to merge those articles? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ogat (talk • contribs) 01:31, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Poor conceptualization

[edit]

Lumping together Soviet, Arab, Venezuelan, Chinese "variants of socialism" under the banner of "authoritarian socialism" seems sloppy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.35.85.85 (talk) 21:50, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:06, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:23, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Authoritarian_socialism&oldid=1210862348"