Talk:Austrophya mystica

Insects Low‑importance

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Austrophya mystica is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Requested move 22 June 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Austrophya mystica per nom. No such user (talk) 14:32, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Austrophya → Austrophya mystica – no longer monotypic John Tann (talk) 13:23, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:30, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@John Tann and Lennart97: queried move request Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:32, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@John Tann: The article currently states that it is a monotypic genus. You'll have to provide some evidence that this is no longer the case. Lennart97 (talk) 13:27, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@John Tann, Lennart97, and Anthony Appleyard:New species in genus Austrophya in addition to Austrophya mystica, see Austrophya monteithorum. There can be found references to this new species at World Odonata List, Complete Field Guide to Dragonflies of Australia, Australian Faunal Directory, original journal article naming this species, and IUCN Red List category. Is that evidence reasonable? Or should I include links here? John Tann (talk) 14:14, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support the move, the existence of the article Austrophya monteithorum is of course sufficient evidence that the genus is no longer monotypic. Lennart97 (talk) 23:34, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support the move, as detailed above. Summerdrought (talk) 06:05, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Anthony Appleyard: Anthony, do you still contest this technical request? John Tann (talk) 13:52, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @John Tann: It was me, not Anthony, who contested the request, and I have since voiced my support, so there's a clear consensus to move. I'm not sure why this RM hasn't been closed yet, but I technically can't do it as I'm involved. Maybe Anthony can? Lennart97 (talk) 14:05, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

On retrospect, this move was mostly unnecessary, since (AFAICT) we still need two articles, one about the species and the other about the genus. I therefore performed a quick WP:SPLIT, moving the appropriate material back into Austrophya, but the articles will need some attention by someone in the know (categories and history in particular). No such user (talk) 14:47, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]