Talk:Austrodanthonia
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Austrodanthonia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606065754/http://delta-intkey.com/grass/www/au_danth.htm to http://delta-intkey.com/grass/www/au_danth.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061101102135/http://delta-intkey.com/grass/www/au'danth.htm to http://delta-intkey.com/grass/www/au'danth.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:46, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Proposed for deletion
[edit]Since 2010, Austrodanthonia has been subsumed back into Rytidosperma. This is now reflected in virtually all Australian and international floras (with the exception I believe of South Australian references).
As this article is a stub and contains only a list of species, I suggest it be replaced with a redirect to Rytidosperma. If anyone is able to expand the Rytidosperma article to include a discussion of the taxonomic history of the genus, I think that would be the appropriate place to include any information about Austrodanthonia specifically.
References: https://bioone.org/journals/annals-of-the-missouri-botanical-garden/volume-97/issue-3/2009006/A-Generic-Classification-of-the-Danthonioideae-Poaceaea-classinternal-link-hreffn1/10.3417/2009006.short https://vicflora.rbg.vic.gov.au/flora/taxon/de8ffcc4-1a6d-491e-86af-4ebb7be679c3 — Preceding unsigned comment added by PeoplesFootscray (talk • contribs) 10:47, 18 December 2021 (UTC)