Talk:Attitude polarization

A fact from Attitude polarization appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 November 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that research into attitude polarization suggests that when people read research that both supports and contradicts their current views, they come to hold their original attitudes more strongly than before?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/November.

Wikipedia

Philosophy: Mind / Contemporary Low‑importance

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Low

This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophy of mind
	Contemporary philosophy

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Similar to confirmation bias

The introduction sounds awfully similar to Confirmation bias, in fact I can't find a difference in the concept. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 2 of 8 (talk • contribs) 09:45, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is closely related to confirmation bias, but it is not quite the same thing. I hope that becaomes clear when you read the article as opposed to the intro. maybe the intro needs ot be altered to reflect the difference? Anarchia (talk) 03:25, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If it is in fact similar enough to be confused, there should be an explanation of the differences. I myself can't point these out; to me, this article seems completely off the mark. Attitude polarization, from what I learned, is the tendency to perceive a viewpoint opposing one's own as more extreme than it really is. For example: say I don't agree with capital punishment. So, I will think of those who do agree with it as people who are supporting killing someone for even petty crimes; thus, I view their position as more extreme than in reality. 2_of_8 (talk) 04:53, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for this article

MartinPoulter (talk) 13:19, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article Needs An example

I read the article and I'm not really sure I understood what the bias means. Could someone please add an example? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.199.159.108 (talk) 04:22, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Adapting some example text in the "Confirmation bias" article.

It seems as though a lot of the text of the Polarization of opinion section of the Confirmation bias article should be adapted to be included in this article. I may do this as an editing job later, but if someone beats me to it, I'd be happy. Anyone see why this section should be adapted over? The examples and explanations don't appear to be covered here (at least, based on my skimming of this article), which means that even though the "Polarization of opinion" section is presented as summarizing concepts of this article, it is covering a lot of information that isn't covered here. -- RobLa (talk) 05:00, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Attitude polarization. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.princeton.edu/~tkelly/papers/Beliefpolarizationfinal.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lee_Ross/publication/232555483_Biased_Assimilation_and_Attitude_Polarization_The_Effects_of_Prior_Theories_on_Subsequently_Considered_Evidence/links/0fcfd5101570b5afbd000000.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/13030952/The%20Law%20of%20Group%20Polarization.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:56, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merged this page with GROUP POLARIZATION

Page now merged with group polarization. Virtually all content from original page was kept, the only omission was the subheader re: group membership, which became redundant once the pages were merged.Lmgoldst (talk) 02:48, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]