Talk:AtoM (archival software)
Appearance
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Feedback from New Page Review process
[edit]I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thank you for your work translating this article. Please add reliable sources to the article or another new page reviewer may end up moving this to draft space.
voorts (talk/contributions) 00:25, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Pabloab: citations should go outside of the period. voorts (talk/contributions) 00:31, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Voorts Thank you! I fixed. Also added another cite. Pabloab (talk) 00:41, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Pabloab. Thanks! I would recommend adding some secondary sources as well to show notability. voorts (talk/contributions) 00:43, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Voorts Thank you! I fixed. Also added another cite. Pabloab (talk) 00:41, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class software articles
- Low-importance software articles
- Start-Class software articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Software articles
- Start-Class Libraries articles
- Low-importance Libraries articles
- WikiProject Libraries articles