Talk:Atlas III

Rocketry Mid‑importance

	Rocketry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spaceflight Mid‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

RD-180

I deleted "They [engines] are license-produced in the US by Pratt and Whitney." This is not true (spring 2008). They CAN be produced in the US by Pratt and Whitney (says Pratt and Whitney) - all necessary paperwork and documentation is available. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.103.73.49 (talk) 00:14, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article in Daily Yomiuri

The Daily Yomiuri, an English-language newspaper published in Japan, ran an article that claims Lockheed Martin has recently discontinued production of the engine that was going to be used on the first-stage of the GX. The Atlas III article (and other sources) say the first stage of the GX was to be the first stage of the Atlas III, which was powered by an RD-180. But this article most certainly must be in error: the RD-180 is still in production, being used for e.g. Atlas V. So the article must mean production of Atlas III first stages (i.e. airframe, tankage, etc.) is no longer possible. Is this correct? Where was the Atlas III first-stage production line? Is it being used for something else now? (sdsds - talk) 03:51, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

News article appears to be very poorly researched. May just be a load of crap. --GW_Simulations_{User Page | Talk} 11:54, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Few flights

Why had this rocket only made six flights? Commercial failure? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.60.208.142 (talk) 15:30, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Atlas III. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140306095016/http://www.istockanalyst.com/article/viewiStockNews/articleid/3716870 to http://www.istockanalyst.com/article/viewiStockNews/articleid/3716870

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:42, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]