Talk:Athleisure

floated

Needs better photos.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 14:03, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: "the workplace, at school, or at other casual or social occasions"

I don't know where you live, but where I am, neither the workplace nor the school is considered neither a casual nor a social occasion. -- dr5357 14:07, 1 June 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.68.216.217 (talk) [reply]

“…neither the workplace nor the school is considered neither a casual nor a social occasion.”

you said “neither” twice. 73.21.9.28 (talk) 17:36, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I propose merging Fitness fashion into Athleisure. I think the content in firness fashion can easily be explained in the context of athleisure, and a merger would not cause any article-size or weighting problems in athleisure. Both articles need significant improvements anyway, but cover much of the same materialUnbh (talk) 07:14, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support merge, although there's little of value at Fitness fashion to merge. At least the Athleisure content seems to have potential if rewritten and in some cases better sourced. — Bilorv (talk) 23:37, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Late, but support merge; someone on that article's talk page likened it to a "first-year college post-Marxist cultural theory essay". Either have it redirect here, or to Sportswear (fashion), which is broader and might better support an actual merge. 70.163.208.142 (talk) 04:46, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]