Talk:Athgarh State

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: Odisha / Geography / History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Odisha (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article needs a map. Please work with the Maps workgroup, to create and add a map to this article. Once the requested map is added, remove the `map-needed` parameter.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Closed. Requesting editor has been blocked as a sockpuppet. Any editor in good standing who wants to open a new move discussion is welcome to do so. RL0919 (talk) 13:30, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Athgarh → Athgarh State — Athgarh could also refer to the town Athagad, it is an alternative spelling. So the state article should include the word "State", like many others in Category:Indian Princely States --TopoChecker (talk) 16:08, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Try this search: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&search=Athgarh&fulltext=1 - it shows lots of references to the city under that name. TopoChecker (talk) 16:16, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose No need to disambiguate. The city can be dealt with by a hatnote. Skinsmoke (talk) 11:01, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.