Jump to content

Talk:Atacama Large Millimeter Array

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Largest?

[edit]

"Largest" in terms of what? Area? Number of telescopes? Money spent? Now, who's right? 145.53.180.22 (talk) 16:19, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ALMA Emblem - usage restrictions

[edit]

In searching for any restrictions on the use of some of the many images available at the ALMA website, I came across this page, http://www.almaobservatory.org/en/visuals/usage-of-alma-visuals, which contains fairly clear guidance of the use of their "visuals".

While they encourage general use of most images, the fifth condition clearly states :

"- This general permission does not extend to use of the ALMA’s Emblem, which shall remain protected and may not be used or reproduced without prior and individual written consent of ALMA. Owners of external websites wishing to link to the ALMA web site may use ALMA’s Emblem for the link, provided they have obtained prior authorisation from the ALMA Public Relations Department and on the condition that such use is clearly identifiable as a web link;"

Looking at the Wikimedia Commons page for this image, I can find no reference to explicit permission being obtained. Perhaps this is because the image was downloaded from the ESO website and not from ALMA itself, but nonetheless I imagine that the same restrictions apply.

Should the emblem/logo be removed?

Inspeximus (talk) 09:55, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

[edit]

It's says that the project was scheduled to be done by March 2013. That is now, at the time of writing, so the article should be updated by someone knowledgeable in the subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.145.124.69 (talk) 13:12, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removed some unnecessary information

[edit]

Not sure why anyone would mention Kazakh word "alma" which means "apple" when this project has nothing to do with Kazakhstan. "Alma" also means "apple" in most other Turkic languages as well as Hungarian. In any case, I removed this bit of information from the main article. Flamdring (talk) 09:34, 14 March 2013 (UTC. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.30.40.124 (talk) 17:21, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What's the connection between the Spanish word ALMA and the project A.L.M.A?

[edit]

Why refer to Spanish word ALMA? Abbreviation A.L.M.A (Atacama Large Millimeter Arra) has nothing to do with the Spanish word. Please correct me if I missed something?

Answer: Because astronomers tend to be clever with acronyms on purpose (see e.g., here or here). Therefore, it is highly likely that, the array being in a Spanish speaking country, they tried to match the acronym to a Spanish word.

Similar Telescope Array?

[edit]

I remember a couple years ago reading an article on popsci.com about a propsed telescope array project that would produce as much data (in a day) as the total internet does in a day. Seeing this array reminded me of that. Could anyone help me find the name of the huge array I'm thinking of? Mchcopl (talk) 22:36, 25 April 2013 (UTC)![reply]

Answer: The Square Kilometer Array (SKA)

Out of Date

[edit]

As per user above, it's well past several of the dates mentioned in-text, and there are numerous incosistencies regarding not just what was planned (and I have no idea how much was implemented), but also inconsistencies in tense throughout the entire article. Someone who has expertise/knowledge on the subject really needs to do a complete revamp of the whole article. Ross.Brighton (talk) 06:48, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Although it is designed to have a resolution 10 times greater than that of Hubble, it will be superseded in 2024 by the Square Kilometre Array in South Africa and Australia, that will have 50 times the resolution of ALMA.[13]" Does this sentence belong here? The phrasing is a bit strained, and it is speculation, not fact. many grand proposed telescope projects have been cancelled in the past. 99.47.116.73 (talk) 01:43, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

HL Tau Planetary disk image

[edit]

Please find out if the planetary-disk formation image is public domain and upload it if it is.HLHJ (talk) 13:25, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@HLHJ: Sorry I didn't see this before - honestly, I thought that photo was here already. It's been in use at protoplanetary disk the whole time. Wnt (talk) 00:44, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Wnt: Great, thanks! Many eyes make better work; I didn't see it at protoplanetary disk. I'll delete this section, then, if you don't beat me to it. HLHJ (talk) 10:09, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Atacama Large Millimeter Array. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:25, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Atacama Large Millimeter Array. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:16, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Atacama Large Millimeter Array. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:47, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Incomprehensibility? - "activates"

[edit]

Regarding:

"Activates for operating the ARC ..."

What does activates mean in this context? --Mortense (talk) 11:47, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Atacama_Large_Millimeter_Array&oldid=1195077208"