Talk:Asus/Archives/2015
This is an archive of past discussions about Asus. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Broken Page on Google Chrome
I have been on a few wikipedia pages, and this page appears to be vandalized with some odd code that generates a very long line break. Sonicdude558 (talk) 00:35, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was PAGE MOVED per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 00:25, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
ASUS → Asus — Wikipedia:Manual of Style (trademarks): 'Follow standard English text formatting and capitalization rules even if the trademark owner considers nonstandard formatting "official"' —Callmederek (talk) 23:30, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
Survey
- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''
or*'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with~~~~
. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
- Support. As per nom. --203.220.171.83 (talk) 09:27, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support The MoS is pretty clear cut on this --Lox (t,c) 19:59, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Discussion
- Any additional comments:
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
No mention of the Eee PC
Why is this? It's probably Asus's most known product outside of motherboards, is notable for being a mass-produced commercial device running linux and it's not mentioned?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.81.36.9 (talk) 09:34, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Queen's University Link
I don't think this link belongs; it's not even the title of the article to which it links. I don't think anyone would reasonably expect that their student government would be confused with ASUSTeK. Furthermore, I accessed the page as /Asus and not /ASUS I think the Arts and Science Undergraduate Society is not notable, and nominate the link for removal. 137.22.99.185 (talk) 19:27, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Does this really belong in the lead section?
The company's slogan/tagline was "Rock Solid. Heart Touching", then "Inspiring Innovation. Persistent Perfection." and is currently "In Search of Incredible.
Seems like a minor detail which doesn't belong in the lead section. The rest of it could also be improved. NotYourFathersOldsmobile (talk) 01:52, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
Romanization
@2606:6000:ca80:1600:3c1d:a752:dc00:50ce: please read MOS:ROMANIZATION carefully before reverting again. You shouldn't use names that in your opinion better match the pronunciation (that is impossible to ensure; instead, it depends on the Romanization method), but the common English name, or if there is no common English name (but there definitely is for Taipei for instance), a standard Romanization.
You also broke the templates pretty badly and they weren't being fixed. Articles shouldn't be in a broken state. LjL (talk) 02:34, 20 November 2015 (UTC)