Talk:Astral projection

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Astral projection article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5: 90 days

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to pseudoscience and fringe science, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Arbitration Ruling on the Treatment of Pseudoscience

In December of 2006 the Arbitration Committee ruled on guidelines for the presentation of topics as pseudoscience in Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience. The final decision was as follows:

Neutral point of view as applied to science: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, a fundamental policy, requires fair representation of significant alternatives to scientific orthodoxy. Significant alternatives, in this case, refers to legitimate scientific disagreement, as opposed to pseudoscience.
Serious encyclopedias: Serious and respected encyclopedias and reference works are generally expected to provide overviews of scientific topics that are in line with respected scientific thought. Wikipedia aspires to be such a respected work.
Obvious pseudoscience: Theories which, while purporting to be scientific, are obviously bogus, such as Time Cube, may be so labeled and categorized as such without more justification.
Generally considered pseudoscience: Theories which have a following, such as astrology, but which are generally considered pseudoscience by the scientific community may properly contain that information and may be categorized as pseudoscience.
Questionable science: Theories which have a substantial following, such as psychoanalysis, but which some critics allege to be pseudoscience, may contain information to that effect, but generally should not be so characterized.
Alternative theoretical formulations: Alternative theoretical formulations which have a following within the scientific community are not pseudoscience, but part of the scientific process.

Occult Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OccultWikipedia:WikiProject OccultTemplate:WikiProject OccultOccult articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Paranormal Low‑importance

	This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Parapsychology (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Parapsychology, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ParapsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject ParapsychologyTemplate:WikiProject ParapsychologyParapsychology articles

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spirituality Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirituality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spirituality-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritualityWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritualityTemplate:WikiProject SpiritualitySpirituality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by .

In popular culture

This section is completely unsourced and is as usual bait for more indiscriminate entries. I thought about deleting it, but decided to tag it and open this discussion instead. It's possible that some entries are notable enough and could easily be sourced... Thanks, —Paleo Neonate – 11:26, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The popularity of Marvel Comics now is such that the first thing I thought of was Doctor Strange using the technique. I remembered that from days past when I read actual paper comics. That episode said he was forced to limit his trips to under a couple of minutes because when he was out of body, his body didn't breathe and he would die. 2600:1700:B9C1:20C0:C412:9584:B21:255F (talk) 18:45, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pseudoscience?

I've never heard Astral projection ever called a science, or ever heard claims that it was somehow scientific. The phenomenon itself is real. Whether or not it entails actually leaving one's body, that's a separate issue and fair game for criticism. People DO experience phenomenon whereby they perceive leaving their bodies during certain phases of sleep (see Out of Body Experience) 139.138.6.121 (talk) 22:55, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Claims of an ability to astral travel great distances and give descriptions of places visited are almost always accompanied by an explanation involving souls, etheric bodies and mysterious energy. That is what is criticized as pseudo scientific. - LuckyLouie (talk) 23:11, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds more like religious experiences (regardless of how real they are) than pseudo-science to me. I'd be disinclined to label, say, speaking in tongues as it occurs in some Christian groups, as 'pseudo-scientific', even if I do dispute it as a truly authentic phenomenon. To be clear: I'm not disputing the use of 'pseudo-science' for detracting from the perceived reality of this phenomenon, but for giving a wrong frame of reference. 82.176.221.176 (talk) 11:24, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@139.138.6.121 I agree. I thought calling it a pseudoscience was odd. Maybe amend the starement to include this point of view? Lunar ether (talk) 14:26, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How can I do that

How can I do that 41.10.1.18 (talk) 09:26, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's a secret. -Roxy the dog. wooF 15:59, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

please teach me Danniey2.0 (talk) 15:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Put your right arm in, take your right arm out. Put your right arm in, and you shake it all about. Do the Hokey Pokey and you turn yourself around, that’s what it’s all about! Skyerise (talk) 04:22, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with wiki article on "remote-viewing"?

Both are different names for the same thing. 2600:1700:B9C1:20C0:C412:9584:B21:255F (talk) 18:40, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Remote viewing is not the same as astral projection according to believers, and the descriptions do not describe the same "phenomenononon", so no. -Roxy the grumpy dog. wooF 20:00, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pop culture: X-Files Season 3 episode 7 The Walk.

The episode is all about a military veteran quadriplegic who kills using astral projection. 23.242.214.23 (talk) 22:17, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]