Talk:Association des Scouts du Canada

Scouting High‑importance

	Scouting portal Association des Scouts du Canada is part of the Scouting WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Scouting and Guiding on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to boy and girl organizations, WAGGGS and WOSM organizations as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to Scouting. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ScoutingWikipedia:WikiProject ScoutingTemplate:WikiProject ScoutingScouting articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Tel (+1 514) 374 95 51 Fax (+1 514) 374 95 53 scout@asc.ca

Category:WOSM member organizations?

Excuse my for writing in poor English, I haven't practised for years...

In WOSM, especially in the European region, there are many National Scouting Organisations, which are federations itself - some of them of more than 5 associations (eg Scoutisme Français). I propose to include al this national submembers in the above mentioned category. Could we do the same with the ASC - even if has a very special (unique?) membership status with WOSM?

If we include only the direct members, we must also remove Norges Speiderforbund, which is part of a federation. --jergen 20:02, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Last I heard, in Europe, those Scouting organizations were members through a central association, as WOSM only allows one group per country to be a member. In Canada, it's Scouts Canada, so this group is a member via Scouts Canada and not directly. --File:Ottawa flag.png Spinboy 00:06, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your interpretation of the European situation is only partly right, in most European countries the WOSM membership organization is a true federation of independent organization (with e.g. different scout laws, different uniforms, different ranks etc.) - but it doesn't answer the question:

Should scouting associations with indirect WOSM-membership (affiliated or as part of a central federation) be categorized in Category:WOSM Member Organization or in Category:Scouting? I'm with the first since it groups the associations in an easy understandable way. --jergen 08:01, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I guess it's not really a big deal if you want to put it in that category. --File:Ottawa flag.png Spinboy 14:38, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I take this as an yes ;-) --jergen 16:40, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

pedagogic method?

What does pedagogic method mean? What are the differences between the girls-only and the coed one? (Alphaboi867 00:11, 16 January 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Merge

agree Chris 16:38, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have merged the article VCPREF method into this one. aliceinlampyland 11:14, 1 February 2006 (UTC).[reply]

"One colors"?

"...in Canada there is only one official colors for the neckerchief..."

Shouldn't that be "one official colour set" or "set of colours" or "colour scheme" etc.? And by the way, in Canada, there's no such word as "color". That's the U.S.American bastardization.

No need for obscure abbreviations

L'Association des Scouts du Canada operates under the name "Scouts du Canada" (see www.http://scoutsducanada.ca/). The name "Scouts du Canada" is the registered trade mark of L'Association. Why use obscure abbreviations like ASC rather than use the full name L'Association des Scouts du Canada? The obscuring is apparently a campaign to obscure the name and impose a POV. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.170.170.169 (talk) 07:34, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Logo

I have changed the logo because the one that was there previously is no more official. As the communication coordinator of l'Association des scouts du Canada, I can tell you, that, in 2012, l'Association des scouts du Canada changed its logo to the purple one. For further information http://scoutsducanada.ca/centre-de-ressources/communications-et-marketing/coffre-a-outils/. Andréanne MP (talk) 19:29, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have replaced it as there is no need to duplicate the already existing purple logo as you did, and we do not delete historical emblems if they are significantly different.

If I understand correctly, File:Association des Scouts du Canada.svg is no longer the current emblem. If it is to be kept in the article, then there need to be related content and the rationale needs to be updated, as it indicated this is the primary logo. -- Gadget850^talk 02:22, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Association des Scouts du Canada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130916003738/http://www.scoutsducanada.ca/association-des-scouts-du-canada/ to http://www.scoutsducanada.ca/association-des-scouts-du-canada/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:51, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]