Talk:Assembly of the Delegates of the Slovene Nation

Slovenia Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovenia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Slovenia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SloveniaWikipedia:WikiProject SloveniaTemplate:WikiProject SloveniaSlovenia articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Slovenia to-do list:

Here are some tasks you can do (watch):

Requests: , Protestant Reformation in the Slovene Lands (sl), Metlika black (sl)
Wikify: Russia–Slovenia relations
Unreferenced: Inner Carniola, Litostroj, Pavel Golia, Predjama Castle
Cleanup: Edvard Ravnikar, Škofja Loka, Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 1308
Expand: Education in Slovenia
Stubs: Ajdovi žganci, Čop Street, Radenska
NPOV: Gregorij Rožman, Siddharta (band)
Portal maintenance: Update News, Did you know, announcements, and suggest Selected article and picture
Help assess the quality of 35 unassessed articles
Take/Add requested photographs

WP:MOS Notes and References

Please don't mess around with the WP:MOS structure. I put it in place because it is in line with WP:MOS. I really don't care what you call it, some people call it References and Bibliography, some call it Notes and References. But the etiquette is that if someone creates the structure, it stays in place. A list of References for the topic (ie cited books) etc as well as Notes (inline citations) is appropriate for every article. It starts the process of moving it forward from a stub article. I will reinstate the structure as I made it. Peacemaker67 (talk) 10:32, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notes is used for explanatory notes, References is used for inline citations, Further reading is used for editor-recommended books. What mess do you see here? --Eleassar ^{my talk} 10:52, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

read WP:MOS, WP:GENREF, and [[1]]. Peacemaker67 (talk) 11:16, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have read it several times and still don't understand what you mean. Current layout seems ok to me (Tomašević's reference lists much more data than before). --Eleassar ^{my talk} 16:34, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]