Talk:Askrigg

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Askrigg is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Viking or Norse

User:Beyond My Ken prefers the term Vikings, but, to me, that has the connotation of seafaring invaders. The farmers who came to Askrigg are more usually referred to as Norse settlers in historical documents. What does anyone else think? Dbfirs 10:06, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In situations like this I'd refer to what the sources say (if anyone has access - they're published sources). Яehevkor ✉ 11:34, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that sounds fair, but which documents do we follow? Also see Norsemen#Other names. The people who came to this part of Yorkshire were farmers, not seafarers. Dbfirs 19:00, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The two sources attached to the statement are Askrigg#cite_note-5 and Askrigg#cite_note-6 if anyone is able to verify them. Яehevkor ✉ 19:07, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think those two sources just confirm that the name "Askrigg" is of Old Norse origin. That fact is undisputed. My question was whether the settlers are better described as Norse rather than Viking. Dbfirs 07:23, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Askrigg/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.

Requires additional photographs
Requires addition of inline references using one of the {{Cite}} templates
Requires structuring

Keith D 21:50, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 21:50, 29 September 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 08:26, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Askrigg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:21, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Askrigg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:01, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]