Jump to content

Talk:AsianWeek

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The original article

[edit]

is it possible to post it here without violating copyright? Xwoodandwater 03:41, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, but AsianWeek removed it from their site. The text of the article is still circulating, however. Lindentree 4:27, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

If AsianWeek's offices are actually located in the "heart" of San Francisco's Chinatown, where is the liver, lungs, pancreas and brain of Chinatown? POV anyone?

Section on one of "feature writers" is odd.

[edit]

The section about Emil Guillermo, the egotistical little pot stirrer, reads more like he himself came on and is promoting his downward-spiriling career. How do you go from national television, to public tv, then to radio, then to free-tabloid, then to internet blogger? I guess the only next step after that would be to go on wikipedia and edit your own profiles out of self-interest. Anyhow the section is oddly promotional. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.74.195.196 (talk) 00:46, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on AsianWeek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:49, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]