Talk:Ashokan Edicts in Delhi

Ashokan Edicts in Delhi was a History good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 28, 2010	Good article nominee	Not listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 7, 2009.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that of the two formats of Ashokan Edicts (Delhi) namely, rock edicts and stone pillar edicts, the in-situ rock edict found in 1966 links Delhi’s history with the Ashokan era (273–236 BC)?

India: Delhi / History Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Delhi.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as High-importance).
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

What is meant by two formats? In the intro this seems an awkward phrase when referring to buildings. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 10:50, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is inconsistency in the capitalisation of Dhamma or dhamma. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 11:04, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In the history section there is a lot of information which is irrelevant to the edicts. A brief is OK but it is supposed to be a history of the edicts not the person who established them.. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 11:10, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ashokan edicts, which have special significance in view of the message they convey, were found in his vast empire in several languages and scripts. What do you mean, found in his vast empire? There is a confusion here between time and place. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 11:13, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have the tendency to use the word "vis-à-vis" quite a lot. This word is not used much in English speech, in fact I cannot recall ever hearing anybody say it. It is more common to say something was "adjacent to" , "directly opposite" or the english words face to face rather than the french saying.. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 12:05, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments. These have been addressed now.--Nvvchar (talk) 23:56, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rename?

Would not Ashokan Edicts in Dehli, or similar, be better? Johnbod (talk) 01:30, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Agreed.

I saw the review observations just now. I will make changes and also reply in the next two days. Thanks.--Nvvchar 13:01, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Ashoka2.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Ashoka2.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 07:49, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]