Talk:Asclepiadoideae

Post to <sastapeliads@yahoogroups.com , asking for help with this article/section

Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 09:30:42 -0500 From: "Willy Wonka" <willy900wonka@gmail.com> To: "Sastapeliads" <sastapeliads@yahoogroups.com>, willy900wonka@yahoo.com Subject: Asclepiadaceae on Wikipedia Hello all,

I recently discovered that http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asclepiadaceae is a very sparsely populated back bone of a section on Wikipedia. Wiki is a free on line encyclopedia. Dr.'s Loukie Viljoen and Fabio d'Alessi have a wonderful site, rich with features and accessories, and above all information. The comparison is appalling. Hoodia of course is there.

I am suggesting that those who have a mind to allow wiki to use some of their non-proprietary information, and have some time to do so, help the wikipedia section.

   * The process is easy.
   *  1) create an account - free;
   *   2) goto the above link;
   *  3)read, then choose a red (non-existent) link;
   *  4) once at the non-existent link, you will be asked if you want to create this page;
   *  5) (if yes) a gui editor will appear  - pictures are uploaded using the upload command from the side bar or simply refer to them and it will prompt u;
   *  6) use (edit) any page as a template.

I don't want this to defer energies from the fore mentioned work of Loukie, so I reluctantly add this here. There are several projects that interest me. Keeping information and knowledge for our progeny / posterity is one.

Please let me know if I am off base and over-stepping my bounds.

Thank you for your understanding, Willy -

BTW I will enter this for everyone to access in the d iscussion tab of the article.

For consistency with other Wikipedia articles, the non-Wikipedia links within the article should be moved to an "External links" section at the end. MrDarwin 20:55, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Asclepiadoideae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:07, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Asclepiadoideae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:53, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Other genera in Endress

Treatment of the genera listed in "Other genera" by Endress 2000,^[1] 2014,^[2] and 2018^[3] + GRIN-Global

Genus	2000	2014	2018	GRIN (as of December 2023)
Dalzielia	not mentioned	not mentioned	synonym	Possible synonym of Marsdenia (Marsdenieae)
Decanema	not mentioned	not mentioned	synonym	Possible synonym of Cynanchum (Asclepiadeae)
Dischidanthus	not mentioned	not mentioned	synonym	Possible synonym of Marsdenia (Marsdenieae)
Gymnemopsis	not mentioned	not mentioned	not mentioned	Synonym of Marsdenia (Marsdenieae)
Kerbera	accepted	not mentioned	synonym	Synonym of Melinia (Asclepiadeae)
Leichhardtia	not mentioned	not mentioned	synonym	Not present
Manothrix	not mentioned	not mentioned	not mentioned	uncertain genus
Periglossum	not mentioned	not mentioned	accepted	Possible synonym of Cordylogyne (Asclepiadeae)
Polystemma	accepted	not mentioned	accepted	Possible synonym of Matelea (Asclepiadeae)
Ptycanthera	not mentioned	not mentioned	accepted	Synonym of Matelea (Asclepiadeae)
Ruehssia	not mentioned	not mentioned	not mentioned	Synonym of Marsdenia (Marsdenieae)
Schistonema	accepted	not mentioned	synonym	Possible synonym of Tweedia (Asclepiadeae)
Vailia	accepted	not mentioned	synonym	Possible synonym of Blepharodon (Asclepiadeae)

Everything that is accepted in 2000 or 2018 is in Asclepiadeae.

Plantdrew (talk) 21:05, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Useful, thanks. For reference I added what GRIN says as of 4 December 2023. Peter coxhead (talk) 15:47, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Endress, M. E. and P. V. Bruyns (2000), "A revised classification of the Apocynaceae s.l." (PDF), Botanical Review, 66 (1): 1–56, doi:10.1007/BF02857781
^ Endress, Mary E.; Liede-Schumann, Sigrid; Meve, Ulrich (2014). "An updated classification for Apocynaceae". Phytotaxa. 159 (3): 175–194. doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.159.3.2. ISSN 1179-3163.
^ Kadereit, Joachim W.; Bittrich, Volker (2019-04-11). Flowering Plants. Eudicots : Apiales, Gentianales (except Rubiaceae). Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-319-93604-8.

[:0-1] Endress, M. E. and P. V. Bruyns (2000), "A revised classification of the Apocynaceae s.l." (PDF), Botanical Review, 66 (1): 1–56, doi:10.1007/BF02857781

[2] Endress, Mary E.; Liede-Schumann, Sigrid; Meve, Ulrich (2014). "An updated classification for Apocynaceae". Phytotaxa. 159 (3): 175–194. doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.159.3.2. ISSN 1179-3163.

[Kadereit_Bittrich_2019_p.-3] Kadereit, Joachim W.; Bittrich, Volker (2019-04-11). Flowering Plants. Eudicots : Apiales, Gentianales (except Rubiaceae). Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-319-93604-8.

[1]

[2]

[3]