Talk:Asayish (North and East Syria)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Asayish (North and East Syria) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Kurdistan Mid‑importance

	Kurdistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kurdistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Kurdistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KurdistanWikipedia:WikiProject KurdistanTemplate:WikiProject KurdistanKurdistan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Syria Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / Middle East / Post-Cold War C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Middle Eastern military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

On 6 October 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Internal Security Forces (Asayish). The result of the discussion was not moved.

Requested move 24 October 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Asayish (Rojava cantons) (non-admin closure) — Andy W. (talk) 22:42, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Asayish (Syria) → Asayish (Rojava) – The armed organization is clearly under the authority of Rojava, which is not recognized by Syrian Arab Republic, so it is not a valid organization of Syria, but rather of Rojava (Federation of Northern Syria) GreyShark (dibra) 18:01, 24 October 2016 (UTC)--Relisting. Fuortu (talk) 12:23, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Makes sense, especially since the Iraqi one can be found at Asayish (Kurdistan Regional Government). And without Rojava, the Asayish wouldn't exist there, too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ermanarich (talk • contribs) 20:47, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not really. The problem with the term "Rojava" is ambiguity. The police forces concerned here are under the authority of the respective cantons (!) within the framework of the Federation of Northern Syria - Rojava (NSR). So if anything, a move would have to be to Asayish (NSR cantons), maybe Asayish (Rojava cantons). But I would not find the move necessary anyway, because the NSR claims to be a model for all of Syria, and Assad does not own the term "Syria", so I think Asayish (Syria) is fine. -- 2A1ZA (talk) 18:24, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just looked at it again, I would support a renaming in Asayish (Rojava cantons), but definitely not in Asayish (Rojava), because the latter strongly suggests a factually incorrect allegiance of the forces. -- 2A1ZA (talk) 20:31, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's actually true. I would support this one, too.--Ermanarich (talk) 00:51, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Foreign relations of North and East Syria which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:32, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 6 October 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 02:44, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Asayish (Rojava regions) → Internal Security Forces (Asayish) – More appropriate name and goes along with other Wikipedia articles better CatmanBw (talk) 19:28, 6 October 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. BegbertBiggs (talk) 21:03, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, I have never heard of Asayish being referred as Internal Security Forces in the past. On social media and news platforms, they are always referred to as Asayish. Ecrusized (talk) 07:36, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.