This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
It's not obvious how his first name should be pronounced. I've usually heard it "Ashel"; if anyone can find a source on that it would be good to add to the page. W.stanovsky (talk) 08:31, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've not read the book "Developing The Pacific Northwest, The Life And Work Of Asahel Curtis" by William H. Wilson, but on this website: https://www.american-rails.com/asahel-curtis.html it is noted that "the author notes the family pronunciation of his name was "A-Shul".
@Nikkimaria: I see that you turned User:Riesengrey's Wikidata Infobox to an infobox with far less information. Is there a reason for that? If the intent is to make the information local and to be immune from future changes in Wikidata, then this would better be accomplished with {{subst:Wikidata Infobox}}, which would pull in all of that information and put it in the article. If not, then I don't see the logic of this at all: it provides far less information. - Jmabel | Talk18:17, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Nikkimaria: That seems like quite a waste of effort. The subst will bring in all that content at once, and it is a lot easier to then remove what you think is inappropriate than for someone to type all of that content by hand. - Jmabel | Talk02:48, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Riesengrey:, I think this now goes back to you. I have absolutely no idea why Nikkimaria wants to make this labor-intensive, but the two of you can discuss which content you wanted to add is of value. - Jmabel | Talk01:15, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]