Talk:Arran whitebeams

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scottish Islands High‑importance

	Scottish islands portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scottish Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands in Scotland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Scottish IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject Scottish IslandsTemplate:WikiProject Scottish IslandsScottish Islands articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biota of Great Britain and Ireland (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biota of Great Britain and Ireland, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Biota of Great Britain and IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Biota of Great Britain and IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Biota of Great Britain and IrelandBiota of Great Britain and Ireland articles

Separate articles

These ~~two~~three species need to be split from each other into their own individual articles. --Rkitko ^(talk) 17:10, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see a pressing need to split the article - it's conventional to treat them together - but the article title would be better as Arran Whitebeams (if it was so it would be possible to redirect species names thereto) Lavateraguy (talk) 21:40, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It could well be "both/and" rather than "either/or". I certainly think the subject deserves an overall treatment, but there is no need to avoid having a separate article for the individual species with a suitable "See also" if someone is inspired to create them. Definitely agree that first steps are to move the page and create re-directs per Lavateraguy. Ben MacDui ^Talk/Walk 10:24, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've been bold and revised this. It turns out that there were already articles for all three species, but one of them had a misspelt title. Took quite a bit of clearing up. Lavateraguy (talk) 20:19, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good work and thanks. Ben MacDui ^Talk/Walk 10:22, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arran whitebeams. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070926231618/http://www.ardacad.co.uk/quad/quad7.html to http://www.ardacad.co.uk/quad/quad7.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:57, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]