Jump to content

Talk:Arnaud Tsamere

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Arnaud Tsamere/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cirt (talk · contribs) 14:22, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I will review this article. — Cirt (talk) 14:22, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stability review

[edit]

Upon inspection of article edit history and article talk page history, article is stable going back several months at least. Next, on to image review. — Cirt (talk) 16:43, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image review

[edit]

Image review reveals four (4) images used, all hosted on Wikimedia Commons, all with appropriate licensing and image information on image pages. Next, on to rest of review. — Cirt (talk) 17:04, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Successful good article nomination

[edit]

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of October 7, 2014, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Writing quality is quite good, I must say with particular regard for flow and ease of readbility and transitions for the reader from one subject to the next within the article.
2. Factually accurate?: Duly cited throughout to appropriate sources with good referencing format.
3. Broad in coverage?: Indeed it is quite thorough, covering multiple different major aspects of the subject matter.
4. Neutral point of view?: Presents the material in a neutrally worded and matter of fact tone throughout.
5. Article stability? Passes here, see above.
6. Images?: Passes here, see above.

Recommendation: I strongly recommend the GA Nominator please work with the French Wikipedia to improve this article, there, to the same level of quality it is, here, at https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arnaud_Tsamere If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— — Cirt (talk) 17:51, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing! ajmint (talkedits) 18:19, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]