Talk:Army Wives

This article was nominated for deletion on 30 April 2024. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about the television series Army Wives. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about the television series Army Wives at the Reference desk.

Television Mid‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: War films

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	War films task force

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Aspect ratio (image)#1.66:1, 1.75:1, 1.77:1, 1.78:1 and 16:9 standard widescreen|1.78:1 aspect ratio]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Spoiler alerts?

What are the Wikipedia conventions or rules on notifying users of spoilers? --Phil Wolff (talk) 00:06, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Spoiler Pinkadelica ^♣ 04:06, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comment on articles for individual television episodes and characters

A request for comments has been started that could affect the inclusion or exclusion of episodes and characters, as well as other fiction articles. Please visit the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(fiction)#Final_adoption_as_a_guideline. Ikip (talk) 11:17, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated photo

The photo in the infobox is outdated and probably should be replaced when posssible. The photo show the Pamela Moran character, who was written out (w/ the exception of a few Season six guest shots) in Season five. Sector001 (talk) 12:36, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if you have another picture at hand then you can propose it but you should note that on the series' website, there's still a "background" picture with Pamela so I don't think it's a problem. --Sofffie7 (talk) 23:04, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of characters page

I'd like to suggest that a separate page for the characters to be created. There has been a change of main cast (i.e. Roxy and Trevor being written out) and the new main characters still do not have new pages created for them.

--Acsian88 (talk) 13:33, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Army Wives. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:45, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Army Wives. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:17, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]