Talk:Armenia–Azerbaijan relations
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Armenia–Azerbaijan relations article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Armenia–Azerbaijan relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090308021931/http://www.ncsj.org/Azerbaijan.shtml to http://www.ncsj.org/Azerbaijan.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:27, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
Removal of article-related info
[edit]Hello dear Wikipedians and dear Étienne Dolet,
I agree there are always ceasefire violations between conflict parties but killing of civilians is not common case therefore I think it should be included in this article. In addition, it is fully clear that this incident worsened the current situation of Armenian Azerbaijani relations and caused assumptions to rise about escalation of new Karabakh war.
Thanks.
Regards, GulchinHuseynova (talk) 07:18, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- @GulchinHuseynova: Please see WP:NOTNEWS. Your addition does little to prove that this incident has a major long-standing impact on Azeri and Armenian relations. Neither the sources nor the addition in the article make that clear. There's been many incidents like this during the conflict. Unfortunately, civilians are getting killed from both sides. But adding each and every incident would be repetitive and not very helpful for our readers. Étienne Dolet (talk) 07:26, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Dear Étienne Dolet,
I see you and understand the rules. But other examples of such case have also shown in the same section why weren't they removed either? and all cases differ from one another, and it is the fact and current situation. You think killing of civilians is repetitive?
Thanks.
Regards, GulchinHuseynova (talk) 08:38, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- It is an individual incident that is notnews in relation to the subject of this article, Armenia–Azerbaijan relations. It is also cherrypicking for effect as I am sure you are fully aware that the shelling was a direct retaliatory response to Azeri ceasefire violations that resulted in the killing of Armenian servicemen. So you could not add one without the other - but I think that individual ceasefire violation is also notnews. However, if it can be found, adding some sourced content mentioning that there is almost continuous low-scale conflict along the supposed ceasefire lines would seem to be useful. Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 20:14, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Names removal
[edit]Since they were civilian losses, we should be careful naming them in a general articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yahya Talatin (talk • contribs) 19:46, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
New Section for Outstanding Issues
[edit]I think it would benifit to have a section for the Issues/disagreements and tensions between the two parties. There are similar sections in other pages about bilateral relations. Midgetman433 (talk) 20:36, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
can the 2023 conflict be added to the wars
[edit]can the 2023 september conflict be added ? 2600:6C50:1B00:32BE:8411:83AA:F7DC:ED84 (talk) 04:58, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
- C-Class Armenian articles
- High-importance Armenian articles
- WikiProject Armenia articles
- C-Class Azerbaijan articles
- High-importance Azerbaijan articles
- WikiProject Azerbaijan articles
- C-Class Artsakh articles
- High-importance Artsakh articles
- WikiProject Artsakh articles
- Start-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Start-Class International relations articles
- Low-importance International relations articles
- WikiProject International relations articles