Talk:Armaniinae
Appearance
A fact from Armaniinae appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 September 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Added image of O. rayneri reconstruction
[edit]I've done a reconstruction of O. rayneri from the fossil and notes in Dlussky et al (2004). Given the poor preservation of the type and paratype fossils and the fact that its position to extant families is unclear, there is some guesswork involved. I have omitted sutures and plate divisions where there is no clear evidence for them. M. A. Broussard (talk) 03:47, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Armaniinae
[edit]Armaniinae is the mentioned as a subfamily in the template for ant classification, list of ant subfamilies and on AntCat. I think we should move this article to Armaniinae. PrathuCoder (talk) 23:24, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- Start-Class Palaeontology articles
- Mid-importance Palaeontology articles
- Start-Class Palaeontology articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject Palaeontology articles
- Start-Class Insects articles
- Mid-importance Insects articles
- Start-Class Ant task force articles
- Mid-importance Ant task force articles
- Ant task force articles
- WikiProject Insects articles
- WikiProject Palaeontology DYK hooks that received over 1,000 views