Talk:Armageddon (2007)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Armageddon (2007) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pittsburgh Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Professional wrestling Low‑importance

	Armageddon (2007) is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Professional wrestling#Countout|countout]] The anchor (#Countout) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
[[Professional wrestling#Disqualification|disqualification]] The anchor (#Disqualification) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Citation for the dark match

Perhaps we've all seen this cited on wrestlezone.com, but its a news site, so we don't want it here. I found this

http://www.zimbio.com/Montel+Vontavious+Porter/articles/3/2007+WWE+Armageddon+Results

and this

http://www.wrestleview.com/news2006/1197878219.shtml - Even says Festus destroyed Morrison...perhaps made the pin, but let's not rush to conclusions.....

Here are some more, take a look and see what's up...

http://wwewrestlingvideos.blogspot.com/2007/12/rey-mysterio-vs-mvp-for-wwe-us-title-at.html http://www.thewrestlinggeek.com/blog1/category/wwe-ppv-results/armageddon/ http://www.wrestlingattitude.com/armageddon.php

I realize a lot of these sources are based around news and forum sites, but its all about the same.--Lord Dagon (talk) 16:45, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If Wrestleview is an acceptable source in D2D (a FA) then I believe it's just fine here. You'll never find a WWE.com source for a dark match. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 16:47, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, on a couple of occasions WWE has mentioned the dark match (like the lumberjack match at WrestleMania 23), although I recall them only doing this 2 or 3 times. TJ Spyke 21:49, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I took the liberty of citing it, if that's okay since you okayed the source and you are as I see it a huge contributor....--Lord Dagon (talk) 18:43, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think that's fine, but others may disagree. And you overestimate my credentials. I don't do many important things, really. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 20:36, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Information and sources

Why can't people understand that you only write information when it is backed up by a source! 90% of this article isn't unsourced. And the "In Construction" tag is not enough actually, because it still doesn't give anyone the right to write some random information without backing it up with a citation. Feedback ^☎ 01:00, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pre-GA review

Well it's pretty obvious that at Report#Aftermath, references are needed. Do this and you're good to go! Limetolime ^{talk to me} ^• ^{look what I did!} 21:27, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Armageddon (2007). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081217015941/http://www.wwe.com:80/shows/armageddon/history/2007/ to http://www.wwe.com/shows/armageddon/history/2007/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:12, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Armageddon (2007). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081222035326/http://entertainment.howstuffworks.com/pro-wrestling.htm to http://entertainment.howstuffworks.com/pro-wrestling.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.wwe.com/shows/armageddon/history/2007/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:54, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]