Talk:Arihant-class submarine

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Arihant-class submarine article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 30 days

Arihant-class submarine has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 3, 2013. (Reviewed version).

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

India High‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was last assessed in March 2019.

Military history: Maritime / Asian / Indian / South Asia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Asian military history task force
	Indian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

Cost

SWAGnificient, you are adding a reference that was republished from Task and Purpose (which doesn't meet WP:NEWSORG) and is written in the style of a blog or an opinion piece. Such sources are not reliable for statements of fact. —Gazoth (talk) 18:28, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Queries regarding image

I recently uploaded an image of Arihant. If anyone has doubts regarding the clarity of the image, please refer to this section of the talk page of INS Arihant.—Vaibhavafro Talk 04:32, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The aforementioned discussion can now be found here. — Vaibhavafro ^💬 07:18, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Arihant-class submarine

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Arihant-class submarine's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "tnie":

From Weapon systems of the Indian Navy: "DRDO on long range Pralay, K5 to stalemate China soon". The New Indian Express. 15 December 2018. Archived from the original on 3 April 2019. Retrieved 2019-10-22.
From K-5 (ballistic missile): "DRDO on long range Pralay, K5 to stalemate China soon". The New Indian Express. 15 December 2018. Archived from the original on 3 April 2019. Retrieved 2019-10-22.

Reference named "IndiaToday2017":

From S5-class submarine: Unnithan, Sandeep (10 December 2017). "A peek into India's top secret and costliest defence project, nuclear submarines". India Today. Archived from the original on 20 April 2019. Retrieved 5 September 2019.
From K-5 (ballistic missile): Unnithan, Sandeep (December 10, 2017). "A peek into India's top secret and costliest defence project, nuclear submarines". India Today. Archived from the original on 20 April 2019. Retrieved 22 October 2019.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:58, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@N Jeevan: could you please fill in the above refs, or indicate at least if the bot guessed correctly? -- Fyrael (talk) 19:52, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What is the use of DLs???

This is too much irrelevant to keep the dead links as apart of the article . They often fail the verification and gives no benefit.They also lack the required or current information . They should removed and replaced by the new ones. I ame Shears (talk) 06:25, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]